The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History


Learn how to remove ads

The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 1998


1998 Closed threads from 1998 (read only)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 December 1998, 07:28 PM   #21 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 400
What is the source for the information on
6 Albatros scouts of Jasta 20? I would
like to know more about this.
wings is offline  
Old 29 December 1998, 07:29 PM   #22 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Billy_Bishop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Mason, MI USA
Posts: 2,567
 
What happened, did your system burp?
__________________
Al Lowe
The Billy Bishop Zone
You can get more with a kind word and a two by four, than just a kind word.
-Marcus Cole, Anla'shok. Babylon 5
Billy_Bishop is offline  
Old 29 December 1998, 07:32 PM   #23 (permalink)
Michael Dailey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
FokkDr1:

On what specific post were you rung up for slander, libel, and defamation?

I have seen one post stating that Cowan may have been sued for libel had Bishop been alive at the time Cowans movie came out.

Is this the post that you are referring to?
Perhaps it is another post that I have missed.

I agree that it is unfair for anyone to refer to you as a corpse kicker, although I do not think such strong words were actually used towards you.

However, having referred to Bishop as a liar,
cheat, fraud, and phoney, and saying that 'Hanging
is too good for him' and also referring to Fonck and Collishaw in a derogatory manner, it may perhaps not be entirely surprising for someone to call you a corpse kicker. I'm not saying it is right, I just feel that if you can level so many names at Bishop, it is not surprising when a living person throws a name or two back at you.

I have not seen Markham's article myself but I understand it is well researched and effectively casts serious doubts on the occurrence of the raid. I also doubt Markham uses the words liar, cheat, fraud, and phoney to prove his points.

I think you have a splendid idea in making Markham's article available for forumites to read.
Perhaps it would be constructive to get with Scott and make this article available and we can all have done with this name calling and proliferation of futile cantankerous threads.

Regards,

MDD
 
Old 29 December 1998, 08:12 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Gunfighter
 
Shooter's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Jacksonville, NC
 
Dennis:

You are correct when you ask for equal time to express your views, and you are equally correct when you doubt the records of Bishop. Even Al admits that the facts are weak in support of BB's "mystery mission."

There is a point at which one leaves the objective and crosses over to the subjective attack (or is it vice versa? Geeeeze, I dunno!). In any case, I think you crossed it.

Don't get me wrong, I have done the same thing, and we all will sooner of later. The correct response is to tap your left breast with your right hand afew times and to utter a few well-placed "mea culpa's" before you move on. Sack-cloth and ashes are optional.

r/s

Bill
__________________
In God we trust, everyone else keep your hands where I can see them!
Only the hits count. The only thing worse than a miss is a slow miss.
There is no second-place award for a gunfight. Never bring a knife.
Shooter is offline  
Old 30 December 1998, 03:23 AM   #25 (permalink)
Balkankreuz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I believe the complete story of Bishops raid can be found in Grimms Fairy Tales.
 
Old 30 December 1998, 04:02 AM   #26 (permalink)
Mark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For what its worth, it seems to me that the 2 June raid has better corroborating evidence than many of Bishop's CONFIRMED victories, which, assuming for the moment that they did occur, must have included a very large proportion of the OOC/DD type, given that they are not reported as losses by available German records. This aside, there does appear to be evidence that Jasta 20 was in the midst of a transfer between German Army commands at the time of the raid. Also Bishop's report concerning the number and types of planes he saw matches Göring's 1930 Air Ministry records concerning the on-the-move J20. Add to this the fact that the raid was investigated for over two months before the VC was awarded and you have to admit it is at least possible that Bishop did as he reported. Without question there is many an issue about BB that is open for debate, but I fail to see how one can state with CERTAINTY that Bishop's entire career was a farce.
 
Old 30 December 1998, 04:47 AM   #27 (permalink)
FokkDR1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Jim,

You raise a valid point! If you've seen my other replies you know of my admiration of Mannock and Mc Cudden. I'm certainly not Allied bashing.
My problem is with one man, one incident. (Career actually)

I tried to find a German pilot to use an analogy to Bishop to even things up but there's nothing remotely close.

Fredrich Noltenius has come under some scrutiny not for submitting unverifyable claims but for horning in on the victories of others.
Frommerz sent him packing from Jasta 27, Neckel got rid of him in Jasta 11. Still in all, in 13 of his 21 victories theres a corresponding Allied
casualty, either plane, pilot, unit, or balloon unit.
Show me 13 Bishop victories with corresponding
losses and I'll fly into the sunset (maybe).

Enjoy Hong Kong,

Dennis
 
Old 30 December 1998, 04:51 AM   #28 (permalink)
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Barrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 5,100
 

As a professional aviation historian, if I were writing the Bishop story today I'd have to conclude that the evidence currently is insufficient to support the VC. BUT, considering the newly-cited report of J.20's move, I'd also have to say that further investigation is called for. This info represents significant progress.
It's easy to assume that because so very few of Bishop's other claims can be substantiated that his VC raid also should be dismissed. But that wouldn't be ethical or fair. The history muse is a hard-hearted wench, and she demands OBJECTIVITY above all else.
Al and I have sparred over Bishop for just about a year now, and we've enjoyed it. In fact, we've even helped one another on a couple of other topics off-line. If he left the lists, we other cyberjousters would miss a persistent opponent!
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
Barrett is offline  
Old 30 December 1998, 05:08 AM   #29 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Billy_Bishop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Mason, MI USA
Posts: 2,567
 
You know what, forget the damn hiatus, I'm getting sick and tired of this crap.

It's the GERMAN casualty reports that came out of Grimm's fairy tales. They likely lost at least TWICE what they admitted to, trying to make the Allies feel like they paid more for their victory than the losers did.
__________________
Al Lowe
The Billy Bishop Zone
You can get more with a kind word and a two by four, than just a kind word.
-Marcus Cole, Anla'shok. Babylon 5
Billy_Bishop is offline  
Old 30 December 1998, 02:46 PM   #30 (permalink)
JimR
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
FOKKDR1...so you werent getting personal? Ive just reviewed.."read it slowly, or have someone explain it to you" sound familiar? Listen, Im not defending Al because hes Al, you can attack him, the Kaiser, or the Pope for all I care. Just do it elsewhere. And I resent your inference that defending Al is some sort of kowtow, liberalistic behavior. OK, my point? YOU ARE CLEARLY WRONG TO PERSONALLY ATTACK PEOPLE. I will only respect you if you can express your views rationally...which you have in the past(I have reviewed the threads, as Ive said.)...so try to do that again,and lets leave the petty crap behind.
 
 

Bookmarks

Tags
whom, may, concern


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©1997 - 2013 The Aerodrome