










|
| 1998 Closed threads from 1998 (read only) |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
3 December 1998, 01:03 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: USA. One Nation, Under Surveillance.
Posts: 2,672
|
If you are a pilot, your opinion would be appreciated. Please hit the "Traveling the Western Front" sidebar on this forum page and look up the photo of the field where Frank Luke landed outside of Murveaux ("the field where FL earned his medal of honor"). In your opinion, would it be possible for a WWI era biplane to manage any sort of landing on the FAR side of the field, where the sheep pasture inclines into the Cote St. Germain? Is it even a logical landing spot, given the choice of the flat field on the nearer side to the camera?
An important point in researching Frank Luke's career. Next time I'm there (2000 or '01) I'm actually going to step off the distance and compare it to the original 700 yard estimate (details in the sidebar text).
Your submissions are gratefully received.
__________________
There will never be concentration camps in America.
We'll call them something else.
|
|
|
3 December 1998, 02:58 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
This is a bit of a curly question to ask Stephen.
Luke was badly wounded, and like MvR, his first
concern would be to land ASAP before he blacked out. As such, a desperate pilot would land where
ever he could, believing that any landing you can
walk away from is a good one.
During training, your instructor turns off the engine and calmly tells you to pick a spot and land. You have to do this without any help, except
if he sees that you are going to make a complete
hash of it. This happens during training - what
could an experienced combat pilot achieve?
|
|
|
|
3 December 1998, 08:18 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Devon
Posts: 979
|
Stephen,
Well it is plenty long enough for a microlight which I should think is comparable (and it's all I have to go on  The slope isn't ideal, but God knows I've picked much worse practising with my instructor - and I didn't have the excuse of being wounded!
Do you know if he landed into wind, or downwind? That would make a big difference to landing run.
|
|
|
3 December 1998, 10:35 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 4,809
|
My system is Netscape Navigator and it doesn't show the bar for "touring." It also obscures several threads with the poll (BTW: how can we access current poll results?)
Anyway: we don't know if Luke made a controlled landing a-la MvR or not. He might have crunched his SPAD and emerged from the rubble. It's a tough bird.
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
|
|
|
3 December 1998, 11:40 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Stephen,
To answer your question.Yes, I could put an aircraft down on either field. I have landed cropdusters in less room than that. But, if I was shot up pretty bad, I imagine I could put one down in your back yard if I had to!
|
|
|
|
3 December 1998, 12:29 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Gunfighter
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Jacksonville, NC
|
Stephen:
While I am certain that your knowledge of this event is better than mine, I also believe that he could have landed on either field.
I have a great appreciation for the difficulties he would have faced on the far patch of pasture, but, if I recall the "landing" properly, Frank Luke actually took off his undercarriage in the act of setting the SPAD down, and that sort of landing he could have done on either side of the stream.
I must admit, from the picture, the near piece of ground is more inviting, but how would they look from the air, in the half-light available just after dusk?
Since the citizens who were witness to these events maintain that Frank Luke landed on the far field, I am inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, pal.
Me? I don't know if I could put down on either field.
r/s
Bill
__________________
In God we trust, everyone else keep your hands where I can see them!
Only the hits count. The only thing worse than a miss is a slow miss.
There is no second-place award for a gunfight. Never bring a knife.
|
|
|
3 December 1998, 01:58 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Hey I don't see a problem putting a plane down in any open field if you gotta. If she is coming down you don't have much choice. The SPAD glided like a brick and needed to be landed with power on if he lost power he was coming down like NOW!
Lt. Dwight Rudder, RFC
|
|
|
|
3 December 1998, 02:03 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
PS: I have landed my NIE.16b in rice fields, hill sides and on a city street, you put her down where you have to and I only fliped her in the rice field. and the other times I took off within 2 hrs.
|
|
|
|
4 December 1998, 12:21 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: USA. One Nation, Under Surveillance.
Posts: 2,672
|
Thanks for the replies, fellas. Keep 'em coming.
Shooter: I never read anything from the witnesses that stated Luke came down in the far field... the only evidence of that would be if the 700 yard estimate placed it there, which in my horrible distance estimation, it does. Anything to add to that?
__________________
There will never be concentration camps in America.
We'll call them something else.
|
|
|
4 December 1998, 10:22 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Gunfighter
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Jacksonville, NC
|
Stephen:
Negative, pal. I miss read your comments and assumed that the villagers stated that he crashed on the far side. Sorry about that....
As for the 700 yd. distance, could not the stream have moved? Streams and rivers do change their courses, and with agriculture and war to add their effects to the equation, this stream could have added or subtracted from the distance to the road over the years. Not so?
Again, given a "wheels up" landing, could Frank Luke not have gone in on the far side?
Ponderable points.
r/s
Bill
__________________
In God we trust, everyone else keep your hands where I can see them!
Only the hits count. The only thing worse than a miss is a slow miss.
There is no second-place award for a gunfight. Never bring a knife.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 PM.
|