The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Learn how to remove ads

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 1998


1998 Closed threads from 1998 (read only)


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 September 1998, 01:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Vickers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does anybody know the ratios of kills to losses of any other plane beyond the camel? I believe the camel destroyed the most enemy planes of the war (1200 +-100) but actually lost more to the enemy (1400) and 300 or so were crashed in non combat situations. Anyone know what the best ratio for a plane was? I realize again that certain planes in the hands of expert pilots could be used much, much more effectively than your average pilot could weild. Like Ball thinking the SE5 was crap even though it really was a pretty good plane. But I'm looking for the best all around plane here. I realize how controversial straight statistics are for alot of people here but it gives us something to talk about. We shouldn't use a plane with a small production run. It's kind of like a batter with a 500 average only having gone to bat twice.
 
Old 2 September 1998, 01:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Vickers
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm guessing the Fokker D.VII had the best ratio but I'd be happy if I were surprised.
 
Old 2 September 1998, 10:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Reinout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Nijmegen
Posts: 850
 
I don't have trouble with stats themselves, I just have problems with some ways of interpretation.

Although I have no records the Fokker DVII probably has the best kill-to-loss ratio. It was built in enough numbers to be eligible and a great deal of victories were scored with it.

Kind regards,

Reinout
__________________
"Despite living in a country where soft drugs, prostitution, euthanasia and gay-marriage are all legal, I've never felt any inclination towards any of the four."

R.Hubbers, 2004.
Reinout is offline  
Old 3 September 1998, 01:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: USA. One Nation, Under Surveillance.
Posts: 2,672
 
1) Don't forget the SPAD 13, who's combat survival ratio was excellent (sorry, no numbers). I do believe that overall, the inlines were more survivable than the rotaries if you look at their record over the entire war, although their kill ratio was down.

2) Here's what US ace George Vaughn told me about the SE 5 vs. Camel: He said the SE was the plane he would want as his personal aircraft to fly just for fun. Beautiful, robust, tame. Worthless top wing Lewis. He said if he were outnumbered in a twisting dogfight and had to shoot down a lot of Germans real fast, he'd take the Camel any day though it was a royal pain to fly.

3) The Camel is my favorite plane for the same reason that the Ferrari F355 is one of my favorite cars... anyone can drive it, but it takes phenominal skills to tap it's full potential. The Camel also demanded a first rate pilot but richly rewarded his abilities... and Fokker pilots had a better chance of tailing the space shuttle.
__________________
There will never be concentration camps in America.
We'll call them something else.
stephen is offline  
Old 3 September 1998, 10:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Richard_Schrader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Gardner, Kansas
Posts: 1,086
 

I believe the Fokker DR-1 could slightly out turn the Camel, but the Camel had better speed. In either case the best pilot would win, unless one of the pilots was flying low over the enemies line, and was shot down by a Digger machinegunner.
__________________
Richard Schrader
Richard_Schrader is offline  
Old 3 September 1998, 01:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
mike_baram's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Kyle, TX
Posts: 2,066
 
I decided to put Richard's theory to a test...I flew a DR-1 against a Camel, and then a Camel against a DR-1. In both cases I got my ass handed to me.
The only logical conclusion is either a: I suck as a pilot, or b: my computer is malfunctioning. (Probably the latter.)
__________________
In dismissing PETA's lawsuit against Sea World, US district judge Jeffrey Miller has ruled that whales are not people.

Obviously, the judge has never shopped at K-Mart.




mike_baram is offline  
Old 3 September 1998, 02:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Billy_Bishop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Lansing, MI USA
Posts: 2,564
 
Hey Mike, do like I do, blame it on old age and tendonitis.


Al Lowe 'Honourary Canadian Citizen'
"On the edge of destiny, you must test your strength. "
- Billy Bishop
Al's caveat to Bishop's Quote: Unless you have tendonitis in your fingers.
__________________
Al Lowe
The Billy Bishop Zone
The posession of arms is the distinction between a Freeman and a slave.
- MP Andrew Fletcher, 1698
Billy_Bishop is offline  
Old 3 September 1998, 06:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
mike_baram's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Kyle, TX
Posts: 2,066
 
Al,
I use that excuse with my girlfriend.....
Mike
__________________
In dismissing PETA's lawsuit against Sea World, US district judge Jeffrey Miller has ruled that whales are not people.

Obviously, the judge has never shopped at K-Mart.




mike_baram is offline  
Old 3 September 1998, 08:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
Ray Kowalchuk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mike,

You got an onboard computer in your Dr.I? Kewl. New tech meets old tech ;^).

Actually, if sims are beEmpirical Proof Ray Kowalchuk reigh@idirect.com 904888790 Hullo, what happened there? Server DDOOC...

Actually, if sims are being given credence, after all these postings about Voss and Camel torque, I got excited and fired up Red Baron (Rev. 1). I flew a Camel against Voss' Dr.I and (after my victory) I looked at it in the mission review mode (Does RB II still have mission review? As a video editor by trade, I find that one of the most intriguing aspects of the game). In a turn and burn viewed from way above, the Camel right-turned the Dr. I quite soundly if I was at full throttle with my nose 15 degrees above the horizon.

What more proof could you need; Dynamix knows all.

RK
 
Old 4 September 1998, 01:26 AM   #10 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: USA. One Nation, Under Surveillance.
Posts: 2,672
 
All of which proves my original point... England's greatest contributions to modern civilization are clearly James Bond, the Electric Light Orchestra, and the Sopwith Camel.

Thank you.
__________________
There will never be concentration camps in America.
We'll call them something else.
stephen is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
statistical, ratios



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Power to weight ratios EdStevens Aircraft 8 11 August 2002 09:58 AM
RAF Aces with high confirmed/identified victory ratios Terry McCormick 2001 28 20 July 2001 09:04 AM
Statistical maxima/minima BillyH 2000 16 9 October 2000 11:21 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome