The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 1999


1999 Closed threads from 1999 (read only)


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 September 1999, 07:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
wingstrutdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 692
 

My Gallery
I am trying to solve a little mystry. USAS combat reports from St Mihiel offensive have several references to engagements with "Fokker monoplanes." I believe Jasta 6 as part of JGI was
operational in the Verdun / American sector at the
time?

However, another source indicates that those planes were grounded by end of August due to problems which resulted in an investigation.

Does anyone know if it is possible that those reports are correct? It seems that it would be hard to mistake a single wing plane in WWI as much as it would be to mistake an ME 262 in WWII. The only explanation that I can come up with is either a number of the references/pilot reports are wrong....or there was desparation by the Germans to get as many planes up and operational to stem the offensive.

Any authors or researchers out their with info on this please let me know.

Thanks.
wingstrutdotcom is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 26 September 1999, 07:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
Iona Gunn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Can't prove it, but a reading of several combat reports leads me to speculate that the difference between "monoplane" and "monoplace" was ignored by some US airmen. Also, it's possible that one or two editors "corrected" manuscripts along the way.
 
Old 26 September 1999, 08:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
wingstrutdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 692
 

My Gallery
Now that makes more sense! I will check those references to monos again. I do think you solved the mystry.
wingstrutdotcom is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
fokker, evdviii, monoplane



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Different Kind of Fokker Monoplane in Progress... Brad Cancian Models 18 19 November 2006 09:21 AM
FTS Movie 46002 - Load test on a Fokker E.III monoplane wing rib AchimEngels Movies and Television 2 22 January 2006 12:37 AM
RAF Fokker DVIII/EV DaveF Aircraft 0 4 March 2003 07:48 AM
Fokker DVIII willycoppens Aircraft 25 10 February 2003 05:23 AM
fokker dviii chris s 1999 2 12 December 1999 07:36 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome