










|
| 1999 Closed threads from 1999 (read only) |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
15 September 1999, 02:07 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Yes - it actually fluctuates!
WWI Aces are not my biggest thing in life - in fact I almost forget they existed for pretty much all of spring/summer '99. Anyways I'm back, kinda so that's that. This time around comes from an idea for a comedic play about WWI aces (which I scrapped anyways, but kept a couple lines of it to be used as the mockery of a presented 'major motion picture' on WWI aces. Basically I'm mocking my previous idea which transformed into another idea on something different...)
Anyways my interest about aces was started by the 1990 game Knights of the Sky. The interest came not in 1990 but 1996 however. It reached an alltime high in early 1997 when I presented my report for school about Allied WWI aces for war/government class. (I'm in HS btw and this site was one of the resources I used)
the interest went away, went up again summer/fall 1998, and died off again. My interest is back once again - meaning I guess I'll post messages on here then.
That's all!
|
|
|
|
15 September 1999, 03:19 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Well!You have been busy! Me, I got up, brushed my teeth,ate a bit,waxed/waned/waxed again;wax on/wax off,you know.Then I went to bed.BTW,Clinton is etirely to blame for both waxing and waning of all types;AND,(get this!)he URINATES!Daily!
Welcome back to the nutty-house,Roadrunner.
|
|
|
|
15 September 1999, 04:17 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Did you say "He urinates daily" or "He urinates ON Dailey"
You are still my best proof that some people should not be allowed to reproduce.
|
|
|
|
15 September 1999, 04:40 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Welcome back Mr Roadrunner, I look forward to your contributions.
Yes, the secret is out, Bill has been urinating on me every day for the last 7 years or so.
As a matter of fact he has been doing this to quite a few folks both in the United States and abroad.
regards,
MDD
I usually don't post on political subjects but I simply could not resist this one
|
|
|
|
15 September 1999, 06:30 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Kyle, TX
Posts: 2,066
|
Michael,
As Clinton enters middle age, one can only hope that he will contract Hillary's prostate problem. That should cut down drastically on his urine output.
Regards,
Mike
I normally DO post on political subjects, and I couldn't resist entering an open door.
(Or was it Janet with the prostate problem? I'm not too clear on that one.)
__________________
In dismissing PETA's lawsuit against Sea World, US district judge Jeffrey Miller has ruled that whales are not people.
Obviously, the judge has never shopped at K-Mart.
|
|
|
15 September 1999, 07:57 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Stockport UK
|
Who's Clinton, and who are all these other people?
New season of "Friends" right? Do women have prostates? I have one like an Idaho red, which reminds me, I must be going.
tata
Peter L
__________________
cheers
Peter L
|
|
|
16 September 1999, 06:22 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Branchwater-there are those EUGENICS tendencies of yours again; what with not allowing people who don't agree with you to reproduce!!When's the intolerants meeting?Do they have a special section for the completely humorless?? Ta-ta.
|
|
|
|
16 September 1999, 07:06 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Yes, just enter quietly and take a seat on the extreme left.
|
|
|
|
16 September 1999, 07:24 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Yep,thats me,Liberal democrat-Commie-Perotista-intellectual-ivory tower-tree hugger!!...did I miss anything?Still havent pinned it down,JL.So sorry.My guess? 156/100,routinely, for you. Hi ho.Smile.
|
|
|
|
16 September 1999, 07:27 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
I'm confused, AJ!
Now let's see if I understand all this correctly. President Clinton ordered our forces to engage an entrenched, politically motivated enemy, backed by the Russians, on their home ground, in a foreign civil war, in difficult terrain, with limited military objectives, bombing restrictions, boundary and operational restrictions, with queasy allies. In a foreign land, with uncertain goals, without consulting Congress, limiting the forces at his disposal and with the majority of Americans opposed to or uncertain about the value of the action being worth American lives.
So, just what was it that he was opposed to in the Vietnam war that he had to run and hide?
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:22 AM.
|