|
As noted in the Best Squadron thread, I've set aside all the things I didn't need to do anyway just to concentrate on more stats.
Two excellent articles in Cross & Cockade Journal (1975 and 83) itemized claims for allied balloons destroyed on the Western Front in 1917 and 1918, respectively. Credit is due Paul Chamberlain, Bill Bailey, and Patrick Browne who provided the data--I simply crunched their numbers. Figures do not reflect unsuccessful German attacks resulting in no victory claims.
A word of caution: the Germans probably bagged a few balloons more than noted here because the Belgian records are incomplete, or were at the time of publication. Any errors of addition, subtraction, or interpretation are mine alone.
In 1917 German pilots made about 190 claims for allied balloons, of which 111 were valid. They also got 8 balloons which evidently were not claimed (attacker shot down, didn't file claim, paperwork lost, etc) for a total of 119, or 63%. The busiest month in 1917 was April (27 destroyed) followed by August (20).
In 1918 some 408 claims were made, of which 332 were valid, for an accuracy rate of 81%. By far the busiest month was September with 81 valid and 16 invalid claims.
The two-year total is 451 (including balloons destroyed without claims) minus some 127 invalid claims equals 324 allied ballons known destroyed: 71.8%. My guesstimate was 75%. Am I good or what?
Somewhere I've seen the figures, but a few hundred allied (and German) balloons that were not destroyed never flew again because they were too extensively punctured to repair.
Please note that under most conditions, destruction of an observation balloon should be just about incontrovertible: a stationary target in a specific spot whose demise is usually spectacularly evident (big fireball in the sky). So, is it any wonder that claims for airplanes maneuvering rapidly in three dimensions are often 2-4-6 times beyond the actual results?
It'll be interesting to see if anyone publishes a similar list of allied claims for German balloons. How 'bout the Coppens-Luke Research Foundation?
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
|