The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 2000


2000 Closed threads from 2000 (read only)



Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 January 2001, 05:57 PM   #11 (permalink)
Tom McConnell
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If Lothar vonRichthofen said that he shot down a Sopwith Triplane, then a Sopwith Triplane must have been lost. The German claims are ALWATS correct and the British ones are ALWAYS suspect, right? I suggest we try to discover who the RNAS criminal is who is covering up the loss of this aircraft in order to embarass a noble German aviator. Now, before you all dump on me, please see my point. BOTH sides made claims that can't be substantiated, and NEITHER side's records are perfect. There were a lot more important things going on in the various headquarters than the soothing of a company grade officer's ego.
 
Old 2 January 2001, 04:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Gunfighter
 
Shooter's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Jacksonville, NC
 
Graeme:

Exactly my point! After Ball's crash, some of Lothar's kameraden are alleged to have shot up the wrecked SE-5 with small arms fire to simulate battle damage which did not occur (Ball most likely suffered vertigo within the overcast and attempted to "pull up" on the yoke while inverted, taking him into an unrecoverable decent). Lothar was "encouraged" to claim Ball by others, and distained such.

If true, that speaks rather well of him, what?

In any case, the non-missing Tripe is a mystery. Hard to confuse the two a/c, I would think. But in combat, the funniest things are known to happen!

VBR

Shooter sends
__________________
In God we trust, everyone else keep your hands where I can see them!
Only the hits count. The only thing worse than a miss is a slow miss.
There is no second-place award for a gunfight. Never bring a knife.
Shooter is offline  
Old 3 January 2001, 05:26 AM   #13 (permalink)
J
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Personally, I wouldn't like to see this turn into a "did Lothar shoot down Ball?"-thread.
After all, if it is doubtful whether the amount of WW1 ace killers (using above mentioned definition) is in its double digits at all, such a list wouldn't be that hard to construct, right? Besides, LvR would be in it regardless.
 
 

Bookmarks

Tags
ace vs ace




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 The Aerodrome