The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 2001


2001 Closed threads from 2001 (read only)


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 January 2001, 12:50 PM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Vigilant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Devon
Posts: 979
 
In December 1917 Haig surprised the German defences around Cambrai with the biggest tank assault in history. His generals came within a whisker of taking the town.

Why were German two seaters unable to give sufficient warning of the impending attack? Was German air policy fundamentally flawed (in being too willing to stay on their own side of the line) or was the air force just over-stretched by the winter of 1917/18?

Informed guesswork invited

Vigilant
__________________
Fly a microlight - http://www.bmaa.org
Vigilant is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 4 January 2001, 01:07 AM   #2 (permalink)
Vin
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: right here
Posts: 1,524
 
The Tank attack commenced on 20 November. There were 380 odd tanks. They were moved into position at night and hidden during daylight. Is there much daylight in late Novembert in central Europe ? This was done at the insistence of Colonel Fuller, Chief of Tanks, specifically to avoid being spotted by German aircraft.

Haig takes the credit for the attack but he had to be persuaded by Byng to allow it to proceed. Haig gave Byng 48 hours in which to achieve a result, otherwise he would call off the attack. This is the same bloke who lost 50,000 (20,000 killed, 30,000 wounded) on the first day of the Battle of the Somme and would not call off the attack. The idea was that after the tanks broke through, General Harper was to follow up with 6 divisions of infantry. He delayed his attack, the Germans were able to recover and bring up machine guns which were able to then hold up the infantry advance (rings a bell, doesn’t it). The advance stalled. By 26 November, the Germans had amassed 20 divisions who then counter attacked and it was all over.


Vin
__________________
Honorary Consultant on Policy and Ethics
On a Holy Purpose
The absolute self-appointed authority
Too myopic to comprehend
Vin is offline  
Old 4 January 2001, 01:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 921
 
Vin,

So young, so cynical...........

(well, maybe not so young*G*)

Darryl

__________________
Nunquam obliviscar

Not here are the goblets glowing,
Not here is the vintage sweet;
'Tis cold as our hearts are growing,
And dark as the doom we meet.
But stand to your glasses, steady!
And soon shall our pulses rise:
A cup to the dead already-
Hurrah for the next that dies!
Darryl is offline  
Old 4 January 2001, 01:32 AM   #4 (permalink)
Vin
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: right here
Posts: 1,524
 
Ah, now Darryl. You are only annoyed because I beat you to the Cobby yarn. If you had moved as fast on the Fouquet Conspiracy thread as on this one, I would have no hope. 3 minutes !

A Happy and a Prosperous


Vin
__________________
Honorary Consultant on Policy and Ethics
On a Holy Purpose
The absolute self-appointed authority
Too myopic to comprehend
Vin is offline  
Old 4 January 2001, 01:51 AM   #5 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 921
 
Vin,

Didn't want to tell that silly Cobby story anyway
*G*

Happy and prosperous New Year to your good self and family.

regards

Darryl

BTW, Gordon, I believe the "O" is silent
__________________
Nunquam obliviscar

Not here are the goblets glowing,
Not here is the vintage sweet;
'Tis cold as our hearts are growing,
And dark as the doom we meet.
But stand to your glasses, steady!
And soon shall our pulses rise:
A cup to the dead already-
Hurrah for the next that dies!
Darryl is offline  
Old 4 January 2001, 10:48 AM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Vigilant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Devon
Posts: 979
 
Vin,

Thanks for correcting the date of the attack (oops). I don't want to get into a "Haig Butcher or Bloody Hero" debate (maybe if you were to start another thread I could be tempted ... !) I do think though we have to be even handed. If Haig was responsible for the slaughter on the Somme, shouldn't he also take the credit for recognising the merits of the Cambrai plan?

In any case, what I was trying to get at was that aviation was a key factor which made it difficult to achieve true surprise in the war. Cambrai is a rare example where it was achieved. Messines and Vimy weren't much bigger but the same level of surprise was not present despite moving men and supplies into the line at night. Why was that?

Vig.
__________________
Fly a microlight - http://www.bmaa.org
Vigilant is offline  
Old 4 January 2001, 11:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Graeme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 2,474
 
According to RFC Communique No 114, very little flying was possible between 16 and 19 November owing to low clouds and mist. Presumably what stopped the RFC from flying stopped the Germans from going up too.

RFC Communique No 115 says "on the 20th low clouds and mist again made aerial work very difficult, but quite a considerable amount was carried out on account of the attack by the First and Third Armies south and south-west of Cambrai."

November 21 - practically no work was done owing to rain and low clouds.

November 22 - low clouds and thick ground mist again considerably hindered aerial work.

Graeme is offline  
Old 4 January 2001, 11:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Graeme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 2,474
 
Blasted internet, always going down halfway through a message!

Anyway, the weather improved on 23 November but there was a gale on the 24th that grounded the RFC after 11am. A strong west wind and low clouds on 25 November made work almost impossible and things didn't improve much the following day.

So, it seems that crummy weather was most likely the reason the German two-seaters didn't see anything (apart from the tanks moving around at night and being hidden during the day).

Sounds like an English summer to me.

Graeme
Graeme is offline  
Old 4 January 2001, 12:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
Vin
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: right here
Posts: 1,524
 
Vigilant & Graeme

German aerial reconnaissence did not pick up the French army mutiny either. I was going to add that the Turks did not know about the Anzac withdrawal but I cannot recall ever reading about aerial presence over the peninsula. One account I read was that the massing of the German divisions was observed by RFC aerial reconnaissance but nothing was done about it. Perhaps the Germans did know but could do nothing. What was the weather like up to 26 November, Graeme ?

Haig the butcher has been done to death. I wonder whether French would have been any worse if Haig hadn’t whiteanted him.


Vin
__________________
Honorary Consultant on Policy and Ethics
On a Holy Purpose
The absolute self-appointed authority
Too myopic to comprehend
Vin is offline  
Old 4 January 2001, 12:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: USA. One Nation, Under Surveillance.
Posts: 2,672
 
RFC 46 was in the thick of it in Nov of 1917, as were several other fighter squadrons assigned to ground attack duties. Not only was there significant flying at this time, it was done in horrid weather conditions with losses from both ground fire and crashes. One German Jasta commander (don't have the specifics with me now), despite his airfield being under attack by Sopwith Camels, refused to order his men into the air under such circumstances. Three volunteers took off anyway, with two of them crashing in the mist and the third downed by the Camels. Can get your more details later if needed, but I'm LA now on a job.

Also, on the day of the attack (20 Nov), sun up occured at 08:08 hrs and sunset at 16:47 hrs. However, the twilight window for daylight operations was much wider... from 07:32 to 17:33 hrs.

If you research Cambrai enough, you'll find accounts of the tape and chalk on which soldiers and tanks were supposed to line up being lost due to the dampness. The chalk nearly disappeared and the tape was lost in the mud. Tank crews had to get out and crawl through the mud, feeling for the tape on the ground in pitch blackness. Some crews barely made it to the line in time for jump off, and virtually none of them got any sleep the night before - hence, they STARTED the battle after being wide awake, working strenuously, for at least 24 hrs.

Also, I don't think anywhere near 380 tanks were at the jump off line on the morning of the 20th, due to mechanical failures and several stuck in the mud during their overnight transit. Have to look that one up as well - I've got is somewhere at home.

You've really GOT to go to Cambrai. The city has grown considerably, but the outlying suburb of Fontaine Notre Dame and the farm fields southwest of town are completely unchanged. Even the church steeple in Fontaine is still there as a landmark. Have plenty of modern pics of this area if its of use. Hope this rambling helps.
__________________
There will never be concentration camps in America.
We'll call them something else.
stephen is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
german, reconnaissance, before, cambrai



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reconnaissance aircraft... castiglione Aircraft 14 13 December 2006 08:06 AM
German Reconnaissance information Val People 0 6 March 2006 08:28 AM
Battle of Cambrai - Tank vs Airplane wingedwarrior Other WWI Aviation 3 15 October 2004 06:18 PM
maps of Cambrai area and Droglandt jonathon People 2 10 September 2002 04:17 PM
research picture in Cambrai, North of France Jean François Destombes 2000 0 14 September 2000 04:32 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome