The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History

Learn how to remove ads

The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 2001


2001 Closed threads from 2001 (read only)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 January 2001, 08:36 AM   #11 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Graeme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 2,562
 
Spot on, Hugh. 7 Sqn was equipped with the RE8 from July 1917 through to December 1919 (according to "The Squadrons of the Royal Air Force" by James J Halley).

Graeme

Graeme is offline  
Old 18 January 2001, 11:51 AM   #12 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Vigilant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Devon
Posts: 979
 
Nice bit of research, Hugh. Most interesting. (I wonder what the poor chap in the back seat thought as his pilot dove down through the smoke and shot yet again!)

On the subject of contact patrols I think it is instructive that 'pure' contact flying was still an important task right at the end of the war. By 'pure' I mean locating the position of troops. A lot of books confuse contact patrol with ground attack - whereas they seem to have remained fairly distinct tasks. On the British side 2-seaters generally flew contact, while single seaters did ground attack.

As for how effective they were - God knows. But I suppose some information coming through the fog of war to the rear was a lot better than none.

I'd be interested to hear how the Germans came up with their CL-type concept. How did the CL planes fit in with the ground troops? Were they used in defensive battles?

Vigilant
__________________
Fly a microlight - http://www.bmaa.org
Vigilant is offline  
Old 19 January 2001, 06:37 AM   #13 (permalink)
Michael Skeet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think Vigilant's got it: RFC/RAF contact patrols were better than nothing. Not much, though. Most of the memoirs I've read don't have much positive to say about the job. And it's not necessarily the violent attention it drew (though that was obviously a factor). But the systems designed for contact patrols almost never worked the way they were intended. Soldiers dumped their reflective panels as soon as they got into No Man's Land, or the cloth panels were chewed up by artillery fire or buried in mud. In the smoke, flares were almost invisible. And the systems of identification broke down so that while pilots could see troops, they had no idea which units they were seeing.

And, of course, by the time the information was delivered to observation posts from which it could be reported by telephone to the various HQs, it was out of date.

My opinion is that no offensive in WWI was subject to any meaningful degree of direction from the rear once the troops had left their trenches. Of course, I'm one of those who holds that, magnificently as the airmen of WWI did their jobs, ultimately they didn't have all that important an effect on the conduct of the war.

Other than dictating the actual rhythms of day-to-day experience, that is.
 
 

Bookmarks

Tags
aviation, bigger, picture


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A bigger picture... John Masters Models 6 28 January 2005 12:46 PM
tripes with bigger motor Stephan People 28 14 February 2004 11:41 AM
Picture of FA 233 (A) frontflieger People 0 21 January 2004 12:22 PM
You get the (B&W) picture Ira_Silverman 2000 7 27 September 2000 07:33 PM
MY ACE IS BIGGER THAN YOUR ACE! Michael 1999 64 12 August 1999 06:46 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©1997 - 2013 The Aerodrome