19 January 2001, 06:37 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
I think Vigilant's got it: RFC/RAF contact patrols were better than nothing. Not much, though. Most of the memoirs I've read don't have much positive to say about the job. And it's not necessarily the violent attention it drew (though that was obviously a factor). But the systems designed for contact patrols almost never worked the way they were intended. Soldiers dumped their reflective panels as soon as they got into No Man's Land, or the cloth panels were chewed up by artillery fire or buried in mud. In the smoke, flares were almost invisible. And the systems of identification broke down so that while pilots could see troops, they had no idea which units they were seeing.
And, of course, by the time the information was delivered to observation posts from which it could be reported by telephone to the various HQs, it was out of date.
My opinion is that no offensive in WWI was subject to any meaningful degree of direction from the rear once the troops had left their trenches. Of course, I'm one of those who holds that, magnificently as the airmen of WWI did their jobs, ultimately they didn't have all that important an effect on the conduct of the war.
Other than dictating the actual rhythms of day-to-day experience, that is.
|
|
|
|