The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Learn how to remove ads

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 2001


2001 Closed threads from 2001 (read only)


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 March 2001, 12:23 PM   #61 (permalink)
Kory Clark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Graeme,

Thanks for that info, I suspected It might be JG3, but oh well. For some reason the idea of Barker shooting down someone named Hinky strikes me as funny. What rotten luck for them.
 
Old 1 March 2001, 12:29 PM   #62 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jollyville, Texas
Posts: 1,255
 
Even if the "records" point was conceded, Allied claims far exceed the numbers of aircraft and trained personnel that the Germans were able to produce and still fight as effectively as they did. The fact is, the British pilots got credit, through a flawed and often capricious system for shooting down planes that didn't really crash. I know that it would've been foolish to follow a diving enemy down, and that through sheer weight of numbers (if nothing else) the Brits controlled the skies, but their victory totals do not come close to reflecting actual damage inflicted. Unfortunately this rule of overclaiming applies to individuals as well, as these men, as individuals, comprised the whole of the RFC. Some were more accuratethan others, but the simple fact is . . oh, if it's not obvious by now . . . .
__________________

"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."

- Denis Diderot
Craig is offline  
Old 1 March 2001, 12:31 PM   #63 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jollyville, Texas
Posts: 1,255
 
The following sentence is what I meant to write:

Allied claims far exceed the numbers of aircraft and trained personnel that the Germans were able to <<LOSE>> and still fight as effectively as they did.
__________________

"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."

- Denis Diderot
Craig is offline  
Old 1 March 2001, 02:04 PM   #64 (permalink)
mosby
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The post by Dan Sans Abbot is important for raising a point which is often missed. The Allies are quite rightfully accused of overclaiming. This to a large extent relates to the fact that a great deal of the air action took place over German territory - that is, the Allies obviously had no way of absolutely verifying many of their claims. However, and this is the point, the corollary of this is that the Germans were effectively "underclaiming" their losses. An Allied plane brought down over German territory was a loss (and a kill for the German pilot) even though the pilot was not injured, and the plane could have been made flyable again in short order. However a German plane and pilot brought down in similar condition over German territory would not be a loss insofar as the German records were concerned - if Dan Sans Abbot is correct.

End result insofar as record confirmation is concerned is that German kills are held to a softer standard. Ask yourself a simple question: How many more "losses" would the German records show if the same damage was done to pilot and plane, but the battle in question was fought over Allied territory?

 
Old 1 March 2001, 02:56 PM   #65 (permalink)
Rest in Peace
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
 

My Gallery
Al Lowe:
It's Dan-San. You have stated this one victiory of MvR's in question as a fact. My test to you is prove it, what are your facts? Don't site on of the Grub Street books, there are alot of errors in them. In a dissussion I had with Norman Frank was , his concern was getting the books out, accuracy is not a factor. I brought to his attention the serial numbers he attributed to MvR's Alb.D.III were wrong and in some cases out of sequence. He flat out did not care! My admonition is: Don't believe everything you read! Check out the "facts".
Blue skies,
Dan-San Abbott
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 1 March 2001, 03:50 PM   #66 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Billy_Bishop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Lansing, MI USA
Posts: 2,564
 
Dan-san,

Unfortunately, I'm still in that stage of moving known as "unpacking". Consequently, many of my sources are not immediately available.

However, I believe that you will find many knowledgable people on this forum and else where who will tell you there IS at least one confirmed victory of MvR's that is NOT an actual victory.

But, given time I will find my sources and then I can tell you from where my information comes.

In general, I don't believe everything I read, unless I read the same thing from several different and separate sources. This is specially true if I don't have the resources (frequently the case) to do the research myself.

VBR,

Al Lowe
__________________
Al Lowe
The Billy Bishop Zone
The posession of arms is the distinction between a Freeman and a slave.
- MP Andrew Fletcher, 1698
Billy_Bishop is offline  
Old 1 March 2001, 03:58 PM   #67 (permalink)
Rest in Peace
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
 

My Gallery
Graeme:
At the time of the Barker fight, on 27 October1918, 201 Squadron (Camel) RAF was based at la Targette Aerodrome in the 13 Army Wing, 3rd Brigade. Opposing the German 2.Armee. The Jagdstaffeln in the @.Armee were Jasta 23b, 32b,34b and 35, of JG.Nr.IV with Jagdgruppe 2 with Jasta 5,37 and 46.
Of the casualties listed that could have participated in this action, were located as follows: Jasta 44 and 79 were in the adjoining 18.Armee and components Jasta of Jagdgruppe 12, Jasta 24s and Jasta 42. With Jagdgruppe.2 at Villiers-sire-Nicole, 24 klm NE of Foret de Mormal on the left wing of the German 2 Armee and Jagdgruppe 12 at Donstiennes airfield, 36 klm ENE of the Foret de Mormal and located on the right wing of the 18.Armee. It is most likely that these two Jagdgruppen engaged Barker.
Blue skies,
Dan-San Abbott
Jasta 9 and 45 were in the 7.Armee, Jasta 43 was in the 6.Armee and Jasta81 was in the German 3.Armee and none of these could have participated in the battle because of distance.
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 1 March 2001, 04:01 PM   #68 (permalink)
RFC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If that is the case with the GOGS books, then none of us can use the German casualties books for the possible conclusion they 'may' be wrong. Case in point with Bishop's score as well as other brave pilots.

RFC
 
Old 1 March 2001, 07:46 PM   #69 (permalink)
Ken McKenzie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In 1959 Mr Arch Whitehouse took the time to document what took place during the first world war. I have read sufficient different accounts of pilots of WW1 to believe the information he presents is accurate in most instants. And as a lot of the surviving principles were alive when the book was written I am not about to reject it.
As confirmation to what I wrote earlier about cutting cards to determine the pilot to get the kill.

The words of the daughter of Andrew David Crickshank who was sent to the front as a member of the 84th Squadron. " His commanding officer Sholto Douglas,demanded that the squadron operate in a formation of three flights of five aircraft, he also insisted that nobody break formation to try to snatch an easy chance to shoot down an enemy plane. Instead attacks were to be made by the whole squadron, which meant that the leader was credited with most of the kills. Although some of the pilots resented this method of fighting it saved many lives, as in the past many new men had been shot down when the formation broke up. The (Camel) squadron's particular task at the time was the elimination of German observation balloons.
Incidently Crickshank ordered a plane from the Ryan Aircraft Company in San Diego for a Yukon passenger service. Lindberg needed a plane as quickly as possible for the $25,000 US to France prize. The Queen of the Yukon became the Spirit of St Louis.

Cheers
Ken McKenzie
www.starapex.com
 
Old 1 March 2001, 08:21 PM   #70 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 400

During 1917, most of Bishop's AND Ball's combats took place in the 6 Armee area, and these German records still exist. They show air casualties, wounded and killed. Could Bishop and Ball DESTROY more than 40 German aircraft with no resulting German casualties? I don't think so. There were NO witnesses for several of these "victories".
wings is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
billy, bishop



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Billy Bishop DennyB Movies and Television 1 6 July 2005 09:41 AM
Billy Bishop Again goosebay People 100 21 December 2002 06:11 AM
billy Bishop alex_revell 2001 2 23 March 2001 05:34 AM
Col. Billy Bishop karen mauro 2000 1 30 May 2000 07:14 PM
About Billy Bishop Billy_Bishop 1998 54 15 January 1999 07:37 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome