The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Learn how to remove ads

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 2001


2001 Closed threads from 2001 (read only)


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 March 2001, 05:41 AM   #11 (permalink)
fred
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The transfer (or delta) of heat units from the hot fins of the whirling cylinders to the moving air was effective, up to a point. (example, stick you hand out the car window, and you will cool the fingers more if you wiggle them in the air flow). There was some marginal improvement gained by installing deflectors to guide more air around the heads. Ideally, the engine should be allowed an unimpeded flow of air, however, all those edges spinning out in the breeze create a huge amount of frontal area. Hence, the cowlings, and spinners, which smoothed the airflow, and protected the pilot from a constant spray of castor oil, and heated up the engine. That's engineering, all those verstunken trade offs...
 
Old 2 March 2001, 05:52 AM   #12 (permalink)
fred
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The transfer (or delta) of heat units from the hot fins of the whirling cylinders to the moving air was effective, up to a point. (example, stick you hand out the car window, and you will cool the fingers more if you wiggle them in the air flow). There was some marginal improvement gained by installing deflectors to guide more air around the heads. Ideally, the engine should be allowed an unimpeded flow of air, however, all those edges spinning out in the breeze create a huge amount of frontal area. Hence, the cowlings, and spinners, which smoothed the airflow, and protected the pilot from a constant spray of castor oil, and heated up the engine. That's engineering, all those verstunken trade offs...
 
Old 2 March 2001, 06:42 AM   #13 (permalink)
leo
Forum Ace
 
leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,859
 
I have read that the Castor Oil emitted from Radial engines often caused pilots to "lose control" of certain bodily function. Is this true, and if so was it a major problem or just a rumor.

leo
__________________
A.E.I.O.U.
leo is offline  
Old 2 March 2001, 01:53 PM   #14 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
mike_baram's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Kyle, TX
Posts: 2,066
 
Castor oil was the only lubricant at the time that could hold up in rotaries.
Unfortunately, it also got burned along with the gas, and the fumes were breathed in by the pilots.
Castor oil is a strong laxative......res ipse loqitor.
__________________
In dismissing PETA's lawsuit against Sea World, US district judge Jeffrey Miller has ruled that whales are not people.

Obviously, the judge has never shopped at K-Mart.




mike_baram is offline  
Old 3 March 2001, 06:21 AM   #15 (permalink)
leo
Forum Ace
 
leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,859
 
Then, Mike:
Your telling me that all those sounds emulating from rotary engined aircraft did not originate in the same place?

leo
__________________
A.E.I.O.U.
leo is offline  
Old 3 March 2001, 06:21 AM   #16 (permalink)
leo
Forum Ace
 
leo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,859
 
Then, Mike:
Your telling me that all those sounds emulating from rotary engined aircraft did not originate in the same place?

leo
__________________
A.E.I.O.U.
leo is offline  
Old 5 March 2001, 02:34 AM   #17 (permalink)
Michael Skeet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I asked one of the pilots at Old Rhinebeck about the castor oil-loose bowels story. He suggested that it was a load of (no pun intended) crap. He himself had never encountered such a problem, and he still lubricates his Gnome with castor oil.

The one mitigating factor I can think of is that the Rhinebeck aircraft are seldom aloft for more than 15-20 minutes at a time, and seldom for more than a couple of flights a week. This contrasts with one or more two-hour flights, five or six days a week. Perhaps the notorious rotary syndrome took time to develop. (Excuse me. I have to leave the room for a few minutes...)
 
 

Bookmarks

Tags
inventor, rotary, radial, engines



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rotary Engines. Crash Aircraft 24 22 April 2004 06:49 AM
other engines than rotary or inline engines in WW1 Volker_Nemsch Aircraft 3 18 April 2002 07:44 AM
Follow up on radial engines leo 2001 8 11 March 2001 12:31 AM
Rotary engine vs. standard radial Ed 2000 17 3 November 2000 06:07 AM
Rotary or radial? Rich 2000 9 7 October 2000 09:02 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome