The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Learn how to remove ads

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 2001


2001 Closed threads from 2001 (read only)


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 March 2001, 04:03 PM #1 (permalink)
Larry Bates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Were turn buckles used to tighten the wires? Where were they located?
 
Sponsored Links
Old 30 March 2001, 05:04 PM #2 (permalink)
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 8,011
 

My Gallery
Lary Bates:
Where stranded steel cable was used for rigging turnbuckles were used. The turnbuckle were most often located on the end of the cable that was attached to the lower wing for easy access for tueing the rigging. The RFC/RAF aircraft were rigged with RAF Wires, which were steel rod swaged to a streamline shape. These had left and right-handed steel clevis universal fittings at each end. By turning the swaged rod (wire) one way would tight the wire the opposite direction would loosen the wire. These were superior to the round cable inasmuch as they had a lower drag. The S.E.5a, Camel, Dolphin, Deh.4, etc all had RAF wires.
Blue skies,
Dan-San Abbott
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 30 March 2001, 07:21 PM #3 (permalink)
Larry Bates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you for your help.
 
Old 31 March 2001, 03:56 AM #4 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 113
Dan-San,

While we're discussing wing wires, do you have any information on the tension of the wires? Over on the Nieuportbuilders newsgroup, they've been talking about how much tension to put on the rigging. Graham Lee ( the original designer of the 7/8ths scale Nieuport 11 flown by most newsgroup members ) says he does it by sound. He says if the tension is right, it goes "thub". If if goes "twang" it's too tight, and if it goes "thung" it's too loose. (Makes you wonder if the best riggers had been piano tuners before the war!)

Was there a more systematic method employed during WW1, or does the "tuning the wires method" sound plausible? Anyone?

VBR,
Dean

PS I'll be dissappointed if Ginger doesn't have a good response to this one! *grin*
__________________
"I'm not short...I'm 7/8ths scale! "

Dean is offline  
Old 31 March 2001, 05:16 AM #5 (permalink)
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Barrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 4,613
 
It's been a looooong time since I was concerned with rigging biplanes but none of those were WW I birds. However, it's possible that an all-wood airframe that'd been subjected to high G could become warped to the point that a Twang would be preferable to a Thub--at least until the bird was returned to depot for overhaul.
At any rate, the rigger & fitter's art is just that--an art, not a science.
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
Barrett is offline  
Old 31 March 2001, 05:28 AM #6 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
mike_baram's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Kyle, TX
Posts: 2,019
 
I have a very disturbing image of a ground crewman going from plane to plane and striking the wires with a light mallet to play a string version of the "1812 Overture".
__________________
"Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one's thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down."

Fredrick Douglass




Dow drops like a rock,
My portfolio takes a hit.
Diversified pain.
mike_baram is offline  
Old 31 March 2001, 11:48 AM #7 (permalink)
andy the tyke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It is possible that rigging was tuned by ear an old trade(listen up/oop Ginger!!)of steam driven loco`s was the "Wheeltapper". This was a man who would tap a locomotives wheels with a hammer.If the wheel went "thunk" it was cracked and needed replacing if it didn`t it was sound,incidentaly when I am roping and sheeting a load on a lorry,yes we STILL do it!!,I use the same method for checking rope tension.Why? because it works.Regards andy the tyke
 
Old 31 March 2001, 01:23 PM #8 (permalink)
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 8,011
 

My Gallery
Gentlemen:
The british aircraft manufacturers use a "Tautness Meter" to check the tension on a cable, tie rod or RAF wire. It was a device with two rollers that could be put on the wire and by deflecting the wire between the rollers determined the tension in pounds on an indicator on the devce. The wire could be adjusted accurately to the specified
tension. I would assume the French and Germans had simular devices. Over tightning would damage the attachment fitting and turnbuckle or clevis. To describe the rigging procedure ,say for an S.E.5a would require about four or five full parts and a lot of time.
Blue skies,
Dan-San Abbott
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 31 March 2001, 01:31 PM #9 (permalink)
Ed
Scout Pilot
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 422
Was there a method for adjusting the trueness of wings for cantilever aircraft like the D.VII? Or were they "factory set" and that was it?

I know from my readings that the quality of the rigger's art not only affected the aircraft's performance, but could be used to adjust the flight characteristics to the liking of an individual pilot. I wonder if some of this personalization was lost with cantilever wings and if it was lamented by some pilots.
Ed is offline  
Old 31 March 2001, 05:28 PM #10 (permalink)
Byron Angel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My understanding is that the RAF streamlined wire offered 1/10 the drag of conventional round cross section wire. Big difference.

Byron
 
 

Bookmarks

Tags
wing, wires



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flying wires goslow Flying Models 4 11 February 2007 05:47 AM
Wind in the Wires fsbof Books and Magazines 0 22 July 2005 04:45 PM
Wind in the Wires willycoppens Books and Magazines 8 16 April 2005 09:29 PM
Wings with Wires Mark_Miller 2001 3 2 November 2001 04:35 PM
Wings With Wires Dave 2001 3 1 May 2001 06:14 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright ©1997 - 2009 The Aerodrome