The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Learn how to remove ads

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 2002


2002 Closed threads from 2002 (read only)


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 October 2002, 06:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
buckt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have a question about throwing a bigger prop on a 200 ranger. Without knowing the torque curve on the ranger could you put a bigger prop on the ranger and reduce the rpm so that it might equate the torque of a mercedes 160? Or in other words is there an optimal rpm range of the 200 ranger that would allow a bigger prop then normal for this engine to be used that might emulate the big torque/big prop performance of the original motor. If not is there a reduction unit on the market that would go with the ranger? Even if the prop isn't in the correct position through the radiator like the original? :-/
 
Old 11 October 2002, 07:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
wolfenbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 615
 
It's not quite that simple buckt. I wish it were because I'd be doing it myself. The peak torque of the Ranger is around 350 ft/lb developed around 3000 rpm.. Running the engine at old Mercedes speed of about 1700 or so would drop the horsepower to around 110, too anemic to do you any good. I've never heard of anyone developing a conversion unit, though it is highly likely and probably desirable as well.
wolfenbill is offline  
Old 11 October 2002, 12:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
monoqook
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you built up a reduction box at roughly 2:1 (not exactly, so the belts rotate any wear/stress points) you would get 700ft/lbs torque at a prop rpm of about 1500 which would put you very much in the same league as the DIII merc. only problems become weight and balance issues. I dont know too much about the ranger as they area pretty rare motor downunder. Im working on a Chev V8 350 with a 2.3:1 belt drive as my power unit. But finding a belt with sufficient rated strength is not going too well, might have to use a HIVO chain instead....
 
 

Bookmarks

Tags
ranger, 200, torque, curve



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ranger Conversion Russ Replica Aircraft 10 9 August 2007 05:46 PM
Ranger engine pricing Der Grüne Flieger Replica Aircraft 5 8 August 2007 07:13 PM
Where to Find Parts for a Ranger L-440? Jeff Brooks Replica Aircraft 10 1 November 2005 09:21 AM
The problem with the 200hp Ranger StephenLawson Replica Aircraft 38 29 July 2004 05:39 PM
Ranger engine conversions olineb Replica Aircraft 2 21 February 2003 01:24 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome