View Single Post
Old 21 July 2008, 05:00 AM   #30 (permalink)
FlyXwire
Forum Ace
 
FlyXwire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 918
Russ,

You could also consider "durability" as one of your fighter attributes. In WWI this would speak directly to airframe strength (such as an aircraft's ability to perform high-G maneuvers like the diving pull-out), and for the WW2 era and later periods to strengths such as armor protection, self-sealing tanks, and things like back-ups for control systems. This also segues nicely into how other weapon system's are judged, such as how armored fighting vehicles are rated; by mobility, firepower, & protection.

Whenever I get the opportunity, I always try to link the online article Aerial Fighting, a short paper written by Captain Arthur Cobby, Australia's leading WWI ace of the Great War. What I find illuminating about Cobby's explanation of air combat tactics, is how he illustrates his own evolution from early dogfighting novice, to that of the deliberating hunter. The article hosted on the Australian Flying Corps website is certainly a good read, and it details an early dogfight where Cobby was engaged in combat with a Pfalz D.III-type too.

Aerial Fighting, by Capt. Arthur Cobby
__________________
Dave S.

"Real aviators are very sharp and not so timorous. That did not help their good relations with the bureaucrats." Willy Coppens
FlyXwire is offline