Larry BB-
I didn't say you had ONLY three - but from your reply, it's probably not too far from the truth.
You can believe whatever you like about the current state of ORA, but you'd be wrong to assume it's anything like it was or can be. I'll give you something of a pass since you don't know me personally, but you're so far off base in every other aspect of your post that I won't even reply to those points.
Quote:
|
But at least we are honest good intentioned people
|
May well be - but when you say "we", you've included people in that blanket statement who have no business managing ORA. It's been said 100 times on this thread - this is not a personal attack on anyone - it's an attack on the methods used to run ORA and the lack of foresight, planning, direction and understanding of the significance of the collection.
At the risk of lighting a fire under you, I would be more careful about tossing out comments like this one without a little more background on the people you are trying to insult.
Quote:
|
You were probably on of those school girlie type draft dodgers of the '60s
|
When I come up to ORA, maybe we can discuss your position a little more seriously nose-to-nose.