|
First, he was not charged officially with the misdemeanors you claim, and convicted. Therefore, he must be presumed to be innocent.
As I said before, I had planned to visit him in '54 with a French exchange lady student I was once fond of who lived in Paris to try to charm him into a rational explanation. Unfortunately, he died in '53.
He has only been tried by the Forum's kangaroo court and found guilty of everything back to the crusifixion of Christ. Again, history revisionism raises its ugly head.
So, stop trying to incite a riot. Rene had so many contemporary enemies because of his loud, boistrous braggadoccio that only a simple mind would accept what some of them said about him without investigating the character of the accuser. You follow me? What axes were those "wannabe" aces trying to grind? If you can establish that kind of thing, you are enhancing truth and history. Choosing up sides and attacking the character of a long dead ace is called "flaming".
|