The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Learn how to remove ads

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft


Aircraft Topics related to WWI aircraft, aircraft engines and armament


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 March 2004, 05:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richlea Sask. Canada
Posts: 618
 
Years ago I had a picture of a Fokker D-7 with no lower wing. The caption stated that , when Fokker and Platz were thinking of building the E-V, they did a feasibility test with this craft, and it flew surprisingly well. Has anyone got a copy of this pic?
R Pope is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 16 March 2004, 06:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Barker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A Place Far, Far Away
 
Yes. and try...Rosebud?
__________________
"A King may move a man, a father may claim a son,
but remember that even when those who move you be Kings,
or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone.
When you stand before God, you cannot say,
"But I was told by others to do thus."
Or that,
"Virtue was not convenient at the time."

This will not suffice.."

-Baldwin Four of The Baldwin Piano Company
Barker is offline  
Old 16 March 2004, 06:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Rest in Peace
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
 

My Gallery
R Pope:
I don't think I have ever seen this photograph. without the lower wing, the CG would be too far forward and would have made the machine very tail heavy. Reinhold Platz was an expert welder, he did not have anything to do with the design of any Fokker aircraft. This is a phony story put out by A.R.Weyl who wanted to denigrate Anthony Fokker, Weyl had an intense dislike of Fokker. Platz was not a engineer, he was an expert welder. At some point Fokker put Platz in the experimental testing department. Platz had nothing to do with any aircraft design.
Blue skies,
Dan-San
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 16 March 2004, 06:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
SteveS's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 530
 
Hi Dan-San,
Could he be thinking of the Fokker V29? Looks like a D.VII with a E.V -D.VIII wing. Pix on page 361 of the old Gray and Thetford "German Aircraft of the First World War"

Salute,
Steve
SteveS is offline  
Old 16 March 2004, 06:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
chip55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dayton area, Ohio
Posts: 332
 
Hello

This is as close as I can get



caption says:

Third of the Fokker parasol monoplanes that participated in the first German fighter trials, the V-27 had a 195hp Benz bz.IIIb engine.


photo R. Ward

from Profile publications 'The Fokker D.VII' J.M.Bruce

Be well
chip55
__________________
I'm out of my mind... be back in five minutes. If I return before I get back, tell me to stay put until I get there.
chip55 is offline  
Old 16 March 2004, 07:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
SteveS's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 530
 
Hi Chip,
I have that photo listed as the V27. here is the V29.

Salute,
Steve
SteveS is offline  
Old 17 March 2004, 12:36 AM   #7 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richlea Sask. Canada
Posts: 618
 
It waas not the V29. in the caption it was pointed out that the bottom wing mounts were visible, and under the top wing you could see the interplane strut mounts . Also the wing was obviously a fabric-covered D7 piece. It would have been an easy matter to modify the cabane to shift the center of lift rearward. That'd be "excellent welder" Platz's job.
R Pope is offline  
Old 17 March 2004, 06:30 AM   #8 (permalink)
Vin
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: right here
Posts: 1,524
 
Why a high winged monoplane ? Wouldn't the aircraft's wingfs be stronger if mounted low and direct to the fuselage rather than above the fuselage ?
__________________
Honorary Consultant on Policy and Ethics
On a Holy Purpose
The absolute self-appointed authority
Too myopic to comprehend
Vin is offline  
Old 17 March 2004, 06:46 AM   #9 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Barker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A Place Far, Far Away
 
Two things occur:
-Pilot visibility
-different aerobatic characteristics, given same or similar proportions.

(probably wrong on the second one)
__________________
"A King may move a man, a father may claim a son,
but remember that even when those who move you be Kings,
or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone.
When you stand before God, you cannot say,
"But I was told by others to do thus."
Or that,
"Virtue was not convenient at the time."

This will not suffice.."

-Baldwin Four of The Baldwin Piano Company
Barker is offline  
Old 17 March 2004, 08:01 PM   #10 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Richlea Sask. Canada
Posts: 618
 
Parasol monoplanes, in the WW1 time frame with the smaller, lighter construction than in WWII, would not "float" on landing like a low wing, and the small amount of wing center section that would be blanked by the fuselage in a low wing allowed a significant increase in wing area for the span. This would give an increased rate of climb and ceiling, which was deemed more important than all-out speed.The pendulum effect of the high wing made for lateral stability without dihedral, making a one-piece wing spar easier to build. Remember, the preferred tactic was to dive on an enemy, so downward visibility was paramount.
R Pope is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
dvii, monoplane



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1911 SVA monoplane jtisch Pioneer Aviation 6 26 May 2006 11:19 AM
Blackburn Monoplane Lyle Pioneer Aviation 3 15 June 2004 09:53 AM
Monoplane prejudice. Dan_San_Abbott 2001 10 7 September 2001 10:56 AM
Bristol M1c monoplane Ray Vann 2001 4 3 May 2001 09:58 AM
British monoplane? GMcManus 2000 5 12 April 2000 04:14 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome