










|
| Aircraft Topics related to WWI aircraft, aircraft engines and armament |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
4 May 2004, 06:47 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 2,515
|
Hi all,
For years I was under the misapprehension that the Sopwith Pup was simply a 1.5 Strutter modified to have a single seat. But, a recent glance at each plane's dimensions revealed that the Pup is a bit smaller than the Strutter.
However, there is a definite similarity between the planes in how they look.
So, was the Pup developed from the Strutter?
Regards,
__________________
Drew Ames
"Drew can talk -- by Jove, how the man can talk!" -- James Norman Hall in "High Adventure"
|
|
|
4 May 2004, 07:18 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A Place Far, Far Away
|
Sure, Luf - that's how it gets its name.
Look at the construction from firewall to about a third of the turtledeck.
Ignore details and look for similar construction solution.
You find it again in a Tripehound.
These three share in common that lattice work you see about the pilot.
Signature.
If you squint, you even see it in a Camel, though the cockpit is re-thought.
Interestingly, you can see the same lines pop up in lots of a/c - Nieuports come to mind as mods to existing, not really departing from line until the 28. Even that looks like a streamlined, refined 24/27, though it apparently did not fly like one.
Sopwiths share a lineage like thoroughbreds, after a glance.
Fokkers do the same to me - regardless of year or ultimate layout of the entire a/c.
The frames share more in common than not.
Albatros is self-evident.
SPADs 7, 12, 13 etc - and vary by refinement of engine and detail.
Like platform cars nowadays.
===
Was just reading about this, this morning.
Engine and total weight, as well as wing layout has a lot to do with these.
While looking at the airframe, look also at the engine.
Look at the total weight.
Look at the control surfaces.
Look for stability/instability and how facilitated.
That's as far as my thoughts take me - the experts (see the AIRCO DH2 thread) can tell more.
__________________
"A King may move a man, a father may claim a son,
but remember that even when those who move you be Kings,
or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone.
When you stand before God, you cannot say,
"But I was told by others to do thus."
Or that,
"Virtue was not convenient at the time."
This will not suffice.."
-Baldwin Four of The Baldwin Piano Company
|
|
|
4 May 2004, 07:42 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 236
|
"Sopwiths share a lineage like thoroughbreds, after a glance"
I agree, but always figured the Pup was a developement of the Sopwith Baby. throught the Baby's evelutionat Sopwith elements that appeare on the Pup, tried out on the Baby, the tailplane is similar to the SS3.
|
|
|
4 May 2004, 11:21 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Staffordshire England
Posts: 351
|
Hello chaps
I had always thought that the pup was derived from a small personal aircraft built for Harry Hawker- Sopwiths test pilot in 1915.
There is a pic of this little aircraft in the pup'datafile special'
Looks very puplike to me!
__________________
'No call from the army must ever find the RFC wanting - Hugh Trenchard
Time spent modelling is not deducted from ones lifespan.
|
|
|
4 May 2004, 11:02 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 692
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Lufbery@May 4 2004, 01:47 PM
[b] However, there is a definite similarity between the planes in how they look.
So, was the Pup developed from the Strutter?
|
Sounds like a case of airplane inbreading.
|
|
|
6 May 2004, 03:13 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 2,474
|
From "Sopwith - The Man and his Aircraft" compiled and written by Bruce Robertson:
"The drawings for the Sopwith Two-Seat Biplane (later to become known as the 1½ Strutter) were passed on December 12th 1915 and in early 1916 the drawings for a Single-seat Scout were passed, followed in February by plans for a Triplane."
The first production 1½ Strutters were tested by Hawker at Brooklands in February 1916 and on 12 April he took one of the new single-seat biplanes up to 7,200 metres (24,408 feet) constituting a new British height record. The first Triplane passed inspection on 28 May 1916.
The Strutter had a span of 33 feet 6 inches while both the Pup and Triplane had a span of 26 feet 6 inches; the Strutter was 25 feet 3¾ inches in length, the Pup 19 feet 3¾ inches and the Triplane 18 feet 10 inches (when powered by the 110 hp Clerget ) or 19 feet 6 inches (130 hp Clerget).
From the same source:
"While the Schneiders were tested on the Solent, the Sopwith sheds at Brooklands were still used for trials on the modifications being carried out on two tractor biplanes, the "Sigrist Bus" and "Hawker Runabout", both derived from the Tabloid and powered with 80 h.p. and 50 h.p. Gnomes respectively. Hawker occasionally took his "Run-about" to Hendon, demonstrating its amazing speed range of 22 to 84.6 m.p.h. and its aerobtaic capabilities."
A photo of the Sopwith Bee appears on page 85 with the following caption:
"Used by Harry Hawker for aerobatic displays, this Sopwith Bee was powered by a 50 h.p. Gnome engine. It was built from Pup components, and had a wing-warping control system."
Graeme
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:59 AM.
|