










|
| Aircraft Topics related to WWI aircraft, aircraft engines and armament |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
3 February 2003, 02:06 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 304
|
Hello, Did the Fokker DVIII see operational service? Was it considered to be an advanced design ? Thank you, willycoppens
__________________
willycoppens
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 04:23 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A Place Far, Far Away
|
As a high-wing, cantilevered monoplane, yes. It had no wires except control.
IIRC, D.8's did not make it back in time to be a factor, but the original designation, E.V, flew in July-August, Jasta 6 of that year and was in combat. Withdrawn due to wing failures and not re-deployed, as the D.VIII until late Oct, Nov.
Naval units flew and scored with this type, I believe.
There is a famous foto of 20 some odd mechanics and assemblers sitting on a E.V wing to allay fears the wing was weak. Tony is smiling into the camera, as usual. Someone here has done a diorama of this, I think and it may be Stephen Lawson...
__________________
"A King may move a man, a father may claim a son,
but remember that even when those who move you be Kings,
or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone.
When you stand before God, you cannot say,
"But I was told by others to do thus."
Or that,
"Virtue was not convenient at the time."
This will not suffice.."
-Baldwin Four of The Baldwin Piano Company
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 04:56 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Who was it that actually dubbed the D-VIII, the D-VIII? I would think that German nomenclature would have assigned this a "E" designation ("Eindekker") rather than a "D" designation ("Doppledecker"). Did the Germans call this the D-VIII too?
Also, did this aircraft type get a crack at using some of the better Radial designs like those coming out of Siemans-Halske?
Joe
|
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 05:23 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Omaha, NE, USA
Posts: 493
|
I have heard that the Soviets (possibly pre-Soviet during the Russian Civil War) flew D.VIIIs operationally. However, I have yet to track down any images of D.VIIIs with any Russian markings on them. Does anybody know if this is true? TIA!
__________________
Matt Bittner
Software Engineer/Assistant Editor
Internet Modeler
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 06:56 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A Place Far, Far Away
|
Matt, the Bumblebee that Osterkamp flew is supposed to have been during the Russian Civil War after WW1. Markings post-war.
Am not sure of the D.8 designation other than oblique reference citing 'spin' to position the perception of the a/c *away* from the E.V it was.
IIRC, it did prototype with a SH 160 and also a (look out, here comes the 'discussion') a 160 Oberusel.
gotta check the df...
D = two wings, does it not?
If so, strictly speaking, a misnomer.
If had to guess, sounds like Tony-The-Marketer.
__________________
"A King may move a man, a father may claim a son,
but remember that even when those who move you be Kings,
or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone.
When you stand before God, you cannot say,
"But I was told by others to do thus."
Or that,
"Virtue was not convenient at the time."
This will not suffice.."
-Baldwin Four of The Baldwin Piano Company
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 06:59 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
So the Germans referred to it as a D-VIII?
Joe
|
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 07:12 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A Place Far, Far Away
|
Both.
(in the df just now..)
E.V prior to withdrawal in August of '18, D.VIII in Oct/Nov upon re-introduction.
quoting pg 25, df #25:
'left, the final batch of Fokker D.VIII ordered, 670-729/18, was powered by the 160 hp Oberusel Ur.II engine. The photos show D.VIII 692/18 (w/n 2694). It was not officially accepted. (i.e. flight tested) but sold to the German government after Nov. '18 and prob delivered to Italy as war reparation. The larger cowling of the 11-cylinder engine is readily apparent.'
It is, too, looks like a dog dish or a UFO...
pg 22:
'...at McCook field during flight testing May '21. 1st Lt. Leigh Wade reported a rapid climb, easy flying characteristics and very good visibility.'
There is no mention of manoeverability but one wonders...
Matt: You prob know this but there is no mention in the df of Russia, only Poland, in post-war livery.
The pic of Tony & the Gang on the wing is on page one of the df. I count 24 men on the wing, equally distributed throughout. There is no deflection or other evidence of load!
dat's whut I know...
__________________
"A King may move a man, a father may claim a son,
but remember that even when those who move you be Kings,
or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone.
When you stand before God, you cannot say,
"But I was told by others to do thus."
Or that,
"Virtue was not convenient at the time."
This will not suffice.."
-Baldwin Four of The Baldwin Piano Company
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 07:43 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Martindale, TX USA
Posts: 758
|
Am doing a 1/32 E.V and in research on Loz fabric covering I stumbled across a web page (didn't bookmark it, damn!) which said in effect that the "D" designation (usually meaning "Doppeldecker" [biplane]) was used because the strength of the new wing had been "doubled" from that of the E.V wing. From what I've read about Herr Fokker in the Forum, that sounds like a little twist he'd come up with. 73's, Rob
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 08:08 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
|
Rob Owens:
*After the wing had been tested and accepted by Idflieg, Idflieg decided (not Fokker ) to change the "Class E" designation, which means Eindecker, (armed monoplane) to the Class D designation (Doppeldecker, armed biplane.). The purpose to to show the aircraft had the new wing. *However, there were some that were delivered after the designation change that still bore the E.V type stencil on the fuselage.
* The first D.VIII accepted was D.VIII 697/18 on 8 October 1918. Eight D.VIII machines in the order D. 670-729/18 were accepted in Octoter out of a total of 61 D.VIII. *In November 36 Fok.D.VIII machines were accepted, 8 of were from the D.670-729/18 order. *in December 1918, 45 more D.VIII aircraft were accepted, of which another 8 were from the D.670-729/18 order.
* *The acceptance date is not the shipping or delivery date, which could be two to three weeks later before they arrived at the Armee Flugpark.
The first Fok.D.VIII accepted was Fok.D.VIII 295/18 on 8 October 1918. By the end of the month a total of 61 D.VIII machines had been accepted. Allowing 14 days for shipping and delivery to the Armee Flugpark, would put the date at 22 October 1918, unloading, assembly and flight test another week, puts the date at 29 October 1918.
The Front Bestand (Front Inventory) has 85 which would have included the Fok.E.V machines delivered in August and listed 80 E.V machines in the inventory on 31 august 1918.
This indicates that only 5 Fok.D.VIII machines had reached the front of the new production and the 80 had received new wings.
In my "Jagdstaffel Aircraft byType" listings, I have no information of any Fok. D.VIII aircraft being re-issued to any Jasta at the front in October or November 1918.
The performance of the BMW powered Fok.D.VII was as good, if not better than the Fok.D.VIII with the 120Ps UR.II engine.
The 145 Ps Ur.III had not made the scene in any force to make a difference by November 1918. From what I have read only a few were installed in a few Fok. D.VIII aircraft.
* * * * * * * * * * Blue skies,
* * * * * * * * * * * * Dan-San
|
|
|
3 February 2003, 08:28 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 2,515
|
Quote:
D = two wings, does it not?
If so, strictly speaking, a misnomer.
If had to guess, sounds like Tony-The-Marketer.
|
While probably not strictly appropriate to this topic, I remember a funny exchange in an Ernest Gann book (forget which one) that went something like this:
The book's main character is offering rides to people at a country fair for a few bucks a piece. A nervous potential customer comes up, looks at the main character's monoplane and says, "How does that thing fly? It's only got one wing!"
The main character replies, "No, it's got two wings; one on each side."
Regards,
__________________
Drew Ames
"Drew can talk -- by Jove, how the man can talk!" -- James Norman Hall in "High Adventure"
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 PM.
|