










|
| Aircraft Topics related to WWI aircraft, aircraft engines and armament |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
3 November 2002, 04:30 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 807
|
I have been having a little bit of difficulty finding details of just what were the problems associated with the (infamous?) Liberty engine produced in the U.S. during the later stages of the war. Other than the fact it was a large engine and apparently oversized as well as overpowered for many of the airframes.
Were there mechanical problems associated with the engines as well? Also, does anyone know the original designer and/or manufacturer? Apparently this engine was known as a real mankiller. Was it just ahead of the curve or did it have fundamental problems in design and/or manufacture? :-/
__________________
" Then we will fight in the shade."
|
|
|
3 November 2002, 05:00 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Gunfighter
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Jacksonville, NC
|
I asked a similar question about the Liberty power plant a couple of years ago and the consensus of all was that the biggest problem of the engine was its weight. The knowledge of the Forum today is much more sophisticated, so there might be other problems associated with that mill.
Shooter sends
__________________
In God we trust, everyone else keep your hands where I can see them!
Only the hits count. The only thing worse than a miss is a slow miss.
There is no second-place award for a gunfight. Never bring a knife.
|
|
|
3 November 2002, 05:20 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dayton area, Ohio
Posts: 332
|
__________________
I'm out of my mind... be back in five minutes. If I return before I get back, tell me to stay put until I get there.
|
|
|
3 November 2002, 11:45 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
The Wright Pat Museum has a large amount of information on post war modifications. They used to loan their material via mail.
Most of the problems of wartime engines were discovered in post war tests, and if you are interested in results of changing cams, etc, this can be quite enlightening. Many of their documents are from the SAE.
|
|
|
|
3 November 2002, 01:04 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
By WWI standards the Liberty 12 was an advanced and sound design, but the engine suffered from a short operating life. The Liberty was expected to have a TBO (time before overhaul) of only 100 hours, which probably made some sense in wartime as aircraft often did not survive very long. But apparently many engines did not manage to run that long. The first parts to fail were the connecting rods and the main bearings.
The Liberty 12 came in high-compression and low-compression versions, with and without various types of reduction gear, and was built by a number of manufacturers; this must have resulted in a lot of variation in reliability.
By peacetime standards the Liberty 12 was considered dangerous and unreliable, so in the late 1920s Allison was given a contract to modernize some (2000 - 3000) of the mass of Liberty engines that were still in stock. By replacing the plain bronze connecting rod bearings by steel-backed lead-bronze bearings, and some other modifications, the time between failures was increased from about 75 hours to 600 - 800 hours, according to Allison.
|
|
|
|
3 November 2002, 04:30 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,681
|
Weldboy -
If you really want to see and hear one - get yourself to Rhinebeck next summer. They have a refurbished Liberty on a mobile stand with a big 9'-something propeller on the front.They run it during the Sunday airshows and it actually sounds great. I expected lots of racket and it's suprisingly smooth.
Now all they need is a DH-4 to stick behind it....
Regards,
__________________
New Jersey aircrew biographies - 30 years in the making - The final count looks like 752 (ha !) Just discovered a handful more by perusing the Royal Aero Club Certs.... this apparently will NEVER end...!.
Please visit: http://michaelonealaviationart.com & www.goldenageair.org
|
|
|
3 November 2002, 10:40 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
I guess you mean other than FIRE !!!!
|
|
|
|
4 November 2002, 03:55 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,609
|
* * Another place to hear one run is the Historic Aircraft Restoration Museum at Creve Coeur Airport just west of St. Louis, and that one is on the front of a repro DH-4, which should be flying next year. By the way, they also have a LeRhone-powered Sopwith Pup with a working Vickers machine gun that fires blanks, and drops shell casings on the ground as it flies by. Also a Curtiss Canuck.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *AK
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 PM.
|