










|
| Aircraft Topics related to WWI aircraft, aircraft engines and armament |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
24 January 2006, 03:53 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,595
|
Camel intake pipes, once again
Looking at pictures of 28 Squadron Camels, such as Barker's, it appears that the intake pipes are belled and angled 90 degrees toward the front, like a deck vent on a ship. Is this right?
Last edited by buzz1941; 24 January 2006 at 11:36 PM.
|
|
|
25 January 2006, 05:52 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A Place Far, Far Away
|
Buzz, this from Camel df 26, JM Bruce, pg 9, second one down:
"Left, after No.8(Naval) Sq. became 208, RAF, its distinguishing marking coonsisted of <snip> This aircraft <snip> and there are minor refinements of the conical spinner on the propellor hub, and small fairings behind the protruding extremities of the transverse tube that served as the carburettor air intake."
Once you begin seeing these in period photos, they're easier to spot.
Some have it and some do not and I've counted at least three different variations of this fairing. In some cases, it does appear to be belled and turned 90 degrees front, but it is hard to judge from photos, alone.
Barker's Camel definitely used this and it appears faired rather than a fitting of that description.
Earlier types show a complete look through, side/side, right through the throttle body of the carb.
Folks more knowlegeable may be able to track which of the various manufacturers employed these.
I've always wondered, too.
__________________
"A King may move a man, a father may claim a son,
but remember that even when those who move you be Kings,
or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone.
When you stand before God, you cannot say,
"But I was told by others to do thus."
Or that,
"Virtue was not convenient at the time."
This will not suffice.."
-Baldwin Four of The Baldwin Piano Company
|
|
|
25 January 2006, 01:06 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,595
|
Vents and fairings
No, the streamlined fairings are a separate issue. They're pretty easy to spot as they give the intake a teardrop appearance. But the teardrop fairing extends aft past the vertical seam next to the intake. These belled intakes I refer to project out and forward, and again, I've only noticed them on 28 Squadron AC. A field modification, most likely.
I'll scan in a better example of what I'm talking about.
The picture above shows the intakes projecting out and forward, from this angle, obscuring the access panel.
|
|
|
25 January 2006, 04:15 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 617
|
Buzz
Have you seen Chaz Bowyer's old Camel book? I'm sure there are other sources for these pictures, but this book has a whole slew of shots of Barker's machine. None of them are terribly clear on this detail, but it is definitely NOT faired...seems pretty much as you described it...
__________________
cheers,
josef
|
|
|
25 January 2006, 11:49 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Observer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5
|
Camel intake pipe
Yes, I agree, the intake pipes appear to be belled and turned 90 degrees .
how ever, the photograph was taken not when the aircraft was with 28 squadron, but with 139 , an f2b unit. Pictures of this airplane with 28 squadron show the standard flush intakes clearly. This airplane's appearance evolved during this time with Barker, including the air intakes. It is difficult to find photographs to confirm this arrangement.
|
|
|
26 January 2006, 12:32 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,595
|
Hell's bells
Here are a couple more 28 Squadron Camels with belled, angled intakes. Note that the bird at left seems to have TWO such intakes.
Perhaps an attempt at ram-air induction?
Modeleers can replicate this part with model-ship deck vents.
|
|
|
26 January 2006, 02:51 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A Place Far, Far Away
|
Thanks for this, Buzz - now I know what am looking at and what to look for.
__________________
"A King may move a man, a father may claim a son,
but remember that even when those who move you be Kings,
or men of power, your soul is in your keeping alone.
When you stand before God, you cannot say,
"But I was told by others to do thus."
Or that,
"Virtue was not convenient at the time."
This will not suffice.."
-Baldwin Four of The Baldwin Piano Company
|
|
|
28 January 2006, 02:50 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,595
|
More belling
Spotted some more, including the plane called White Feather. Camels with these modified intakes all seem to be based in Italy.
|
|
|
28 January 2006, 07:29 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 331
|
Hello Buzz,
It is my understanding that this modification was Barker's own concept and that he made other improvements to this aircraft. It is not a bad idea and may have spread as a field modification. Sadly, I no longer recall the reference so can't document this.
Best,
William
__________________
Audentes Fortuna Juvat!
Canvas Falcon Engineering
www.canvasfalcon.com
canvasfalcon@msn.com
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:51 PM.
|