Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim
I believe that photo is not a Friedrichshaven G.IV but rather a G.IVa. The compound empenage (box-kite shaped double tail) was used on the IVa while the standard empenage (single verticle fin tail) was used on the G.IV.
|
True, the P.u.W. bomb under it's belly kind of makes that obvious, which should have rung some bells in my head

. Any idea when or where this photo was taken?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim
In that old thread, Dan San was opining on whether the Friedrichshaven G.IIIa from which my dataplate came from could have seen front-line service. My dataplate is from 1048/18 and he was offering thoughts about how long it would have taken to get it shipped from the factory to the air park where it was set up and test flown before being sent to a front line unit. His thinking was that it was kind of iffy. If 1048/18 was iffy, then I would think that the G.IV that was captured and put on display in London which was serial number 1074/18 would be much less likely. He does mention the G.IV prototype that was built in 1917 though. I'll let Dan San chime in here though as he is the bomber expert - not me.
|
I pretty much figured it was a long shot but being an eternal optimist I had to ask. Using the word 'captured' causes it to sound like 1074/18 was shot down and captured in tact as opposed to it being.... ummm....
'obtained' 
from the German government as a
'war-reperation' under the terms of the treaty of Versailles.
I'm interested in finding out if any of these Fdh G.IV/IVa bombers ever reached operational units and the same incidentally goes for the Gotha G.VII-IX series. I keep finding hints and claims
(like in that German book I mentioned) that a few reached the front before the armistice but never any photos or information on which units operated them.