|
Hi all,
I'll chime in on the Mercedes D.IIIa as I'm personally familiar with it.
The oil pump does the following;
1. Pump oil (from the oil reservoir in the crankcase of the motor) to the main bearings (of the crankshaft), and up to the camshaft housing.
2. Pump oil into the crankcase reservoir from the auxilliary oil tank. This oil tank was sometimes part of the fuel tank or was a separate stand alone tank.
3. There is a maximum level tube in the crankcase reservoir, any oil that supercedes that level is pulled into the oil pump and pumped out to the auxilliary oil tank. If you had a "tight" motor that consumed very little oil, the action of the oil pump would constantly bring fresh oil into the system and "overfill" the crankcase causing the excess oil to be pumped back out to the auxilliary oil tank, or in other words circulate the oil constantly to and fro from the crankcase reservoir and the auxilliary oil tank.
When Romani started this thread he showed where the Sopwith's rotary had a "pressurized fuel system". The Fokker Dr.I, E.V and other rotary powered Fokkers never had pressurized fuel systems. As I recall, on a Dr.I your instruments as from the factory were ultra-basic consisting of tachometer, compass, and main fuel gauge; there were no fuel pressure gauges.
Did other rotary powered aircraft utilize a pressurized fuel system?
A long time ago I did a thread on the robustness of a rotary powered Dr.I as compared to an in-line powered D.VII, with regards to the D.VII having much more susceptibility with a radiator, pressurized fuel system, and more vulnerable oil, water, air, and fuel system.
As well, all things being equal, when fabricating a replica there is more cost and infrastructure with an in-line water-cooled powered aircraft over a rotary powered aircraft; say a Fokker D.7 as compared to a Fokker D.6.
Best wishes,
Dave
Last edited by Dave_Watts; 21 January 2007 at 10:02 PM.
|