










|
| Aircraft Topics related to WWI aircraft, aircraft engines and armament |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
10 March 2007, 03:38 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Der Falke von Ruritania
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Above the trenches
Posts: 1,421
|
Can you identify this double rotary, double guns airplane
Double rotary, double guns... am I seeing double? I'ts a duppeldecker or I am easily duped?
This is a screen capture from a BBC DVD docummentary on the weapons of WWII, the chapter dedicated to machineguns, there's nothing more to see about this one particular machine.
The frame and the stenciling on the fuselage side and oh yeah, the streaky finish (funny how we miss the obvious clues) suggest to me a Fokker machine, but wich?
|
|
|
10 March 2007, 04:03 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: St. Charles, Iowa
Posts: 3,626
|
Hi Romani,
This is from a fairly well-known sequence shot at the Fokker factory by Tony Fokker (a dedicated cinematographer) or one of his workers. It shows a test of the guns on Fokker D.III D.3023/16. This was one of the final batch of 100 D.III fighters (serials D.2930 - 3029/16) ordered in November 1916. It displays the typical Fokker streaky finish, which seems to have been applied to a number of these late-production D.IIIs.
The Fokker D.III was equipped with the twin-row 160 h.p. Oberursel U.III rotary and did indeed mount twin machine guns.The most famous example of a D.III was Boelcke's D.III D.352/16, in which he scored the first six or so victories for Jasta 2.
Greg
__________________
Greg VanWyngarden
|
|
|
10 March 2007, 04:11 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
|
What is it??
Romani:
It is a Fok.D.III. It was used in late 1916. A total of 210 were built: 30 July 1916, D.350/16 to D.379/16; 20 July 1916, D.1004/16 to D.1023/16; 60 August 1916, D.1580/16 to 1639/16; 100 November 1916, D.2930 to 3029/16. The Fok.D.III at least saw service with Jasta 1, 2,
5, 14, 15, 37.
Blue skies,
Dan-San
Last edited by Dan_San_Abbott; 11 March 2007 at 12:52 PM.
|
|
|
10 March 2007, 04:16 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Der Falke von Ruritania
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Above the trenches
Posts: 1,421
|
Thank you very much mister Wyngarden, is such an honor when a celebrity comes down from Olympus to enligthen us
While, we are at it, I have to praise you for your fantastic book "Early German Aces" because it fills that gap on the obscure first German biplanes in the second half of 1916. It seems as if every chronicle about WWI aviation goes straight from the Fokker Scourge to Bloody April, from the Eindecker to the Albatros!
And no doubt that image of the streaky finish will stir that troublesome paint once more in the future!
EDIT: My thanks are extended to you Dan San, that's valuable information that will be put to use, thanks for sharing!
EDIT SOME MORE: Interesting that Fokker persevered with the double star rotary... I thought they pulled that stunt only once with the EIV and gave it up for good. Then again, if all you got is lemons, then you have to make some lemonade, I am fully understanding now the context of an statement I read once that since Fokker had no access to the inline engines used by his competitors he had to settle with rotaries and design airplanes around them. I wonder what happened for Fokker being able to put his hands on Mercedes engines wich led to the DVII... a change of official policy given the disappointment of the last models of Albatros?
Last edited by Romani; 10 March 2007 at 04:25 PM.
|
|
|
18 March 2007, 03:16 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Apeldoorn, Netherlands
Posts: 5,287
|
Quote:
|
I am fully understanding now the context of a statement I read once that since Fokker had no access to the inline engines used by his competitors he had to settle with rotaries and design airplanes around them
|
I have never seen evidence for the statement that Fokker did not have access to inline engines.
I have in my memory that Fokker favoured the rotary engines for the agility he could get from his machines (the Dr.I). Incidentally I have not looked it up but their was a Fokker triplane with an inline engine in the V series.
Kees
|
|
|
23 March 2007, 06:31 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,859
|
Fok DIII
It is my understanding that none of the airplanes equipped with the 160 HP Obereusel engine were sucessful. Weight? Cooling? Lubrication?
Fokker V6 had an inline Mercedes 120 HP engine. It was a triplane with an extended fuselage.
__________________
A.E.I.O.U.
|
|
|
23 March 2007, 07:02 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 328
|
If memory serves, cooling was an issue. Placing an engine that requires air cooling behind another hot engine is just not a great idea.
|
|
|
23 March 2007, 08:43 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,738
|
Romani- Remember, Fokker owned Oberursel so had a vested interest in having the U.III succeed. He even tried one in a Triplane, Fokker V.7, WN 1830. Unfortunately we have no test data on that aircraft, but results could not have been outstanding and the aircraft was converted back to a standard Dr.I.
In Oberursel's defense, their license copies of the Greek letter Gnomes worked better than their French counterparts because the Germans extended the engine controls into the cockpit and did not have to make do with just a coupe switch.
Taz
Terry Phillips
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:08 AM.
|