Breguet's Crashfile ID Challenge #318b

['14-'18aviationcollector]

OK, well I hope this one hasn't been posted before!

Scoreboard At the end of #318

34.3 FOKKERJ Feuchtwanger ¤ the Ace of Aces ¤
31.7 Froggy ¤
28.6 Rbailey ¤
21.00 Breguet
17.15 YavorD
16.5 Flamingo
12.60 Richard B
09.75 Aquilius
08.3 Varese2002
08.25 AROTH
08.0 ONEALM
07.9 Gregvan
8.1 Rod_Filan
05.75 Ross
05.7 Jeroplan
05.5 Expositor
05.5 Gilles
05.0 Dan_San
05.0 Kilian
04.8 '14-'18aviationcollector
04.4 matte_kudasai
04.0 Edmond
04.0 Eric
04.0 Laserlloyd
03.5 sergio_vitalio
03.3 PaulForster
03.2 Colin A Owers
03.2 Crankcase
03.0 Crimso
03.0 Patrick
02.7 Tbstreet
02.0 Cruze
02.0 Rickenbaron
01.8 gregorydquist
01.8 Tom L
01.5 Nieuport 14
01.45 Ransom E. Olds
01.0 Albatros_Ace
01.0 Ampovandak
01.0 Berman
01.0 brisfitworks
01.0 Cliff
01.0 Pvernon
01.0 rammjaeger
01.0 Rexee
01.0 RONNY BAR
01.0 Troy Raines
00.5 Miroslav Pokorny
00.1 SCMc

The rules :
1) All aircraft are of the 14-18 period (Must have left the ground during this period).
2) All "ACES" with a score of 5.0 or higher must obey the 3.0 hour handicap. All others with a score of ZERO to 4.99 may start immediately, if not sooner!
3) To be eligible for correct ID an answer must include at least one characteristic of the aircraft that helped in its identification.
4) And whom ever wins this challenge will have to provide a new one! If this can not be done for any reason, please PM Breguet and he will take over as host!
5)If an ace gives the correct answer too early, the challenge is over, he gets no point but has to post the next challenge. In lieu of the fact that the "novices" have in effect been "cheated" of their "exclusive" time that next post should be a relatively easy one. Anyone repeating the correct answer at the right time gets neither a point nor the right to post the next challenge.
6) The final arbitrator of all things to do with the "rules" is Breguet.

Breguet's Crash Files

[matte_kudasai]

Evidently, this is Henri Farman (nacelle, wings), but which number?
I have 3 choices: HF.15, HF.16, HF.20, HF.22
I see that leading edge is not straight (slightly arrowed), and if it is not because of the crash, this is not HF.15.
HF.22 had chassis without a skid, but I can't see it on the picture...
I have picture from Osprey book with similarly painted HF, but if has wrong subscript - it says that it's HF.22 but it has chassis with skids.
So, I think it's HF.16 or HF.20. My books says that there wasn't EXTERNAL differences between this models...

[Breguet]

Originally Posted by matte_kudasai

So, I think it's HF.16 or HF.20. My books says that there wasn't EXTERNAL differences between this models...

So are we going to make a choice?

[matte_kudasai]

Originally Posted by Breguet

So are we going to make a choice?

No
You can not to give me a point, but if there is no visible differences, how can I choose?

[crankcase]

It's obviously a HF.16!
=0)
marc

[Jeroplan]

No, it's obviously a HF.20!

Boris

[FOKKERJ]

Originally Posted by crankcase

It's obviously a HF.16!
=0)
marc

Originally Posted by Jeroplan

No, it's obviously a HF.20!

Boris

Originally Posted by Breguet

So are we going to make a choice?

Hey....you got peanut butter in my chocolate!

HAPPY TRAILS, FOKKERJ Feuchtwanger

[Breguet]

Originally Posted by FOKKERJ

Hey....you got peanut butter in my chocolate!HAPPY TRAILS, FOKKERJ Feuchtwanger

I can see how you might think the nacelle looks like a Snickers bar (a chocolate covered peanut bar we have here) But as I have not heard of a Horace (nor for that matter a Maurice) Farman Snickers I don't think you've got it quite right yet .

[AROTH]

So far, we can all agree that it is a useless pile of sticks........

[Rbailey]

Then how about an HF 22? (elevator control rod)
/