










|
| Aircraft Topics related to WWI aircraft, aircraft engines and armament |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
10 December 2009, 02:18 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregvan
Hi There,
The unknown pilot's personal marking was based on the epaulette badge of his former unit. In the old "Profile Publication" on the SSW D.III and D.IV, this Peter Grosz photo is indeed captioned as showing 8356/17.
|
Hello,
I don´t know if this is known, or if this helps for identification about the pilot with the former unit emblem, but the sign is of
2. Ostpreußische Grenadier-Regiment Friedrich Wilhelm I. Nummer 3.
Grenadier-Regiment König Friedrich Wilhelm I. ( 2. Ostpreußisches ) Nr. 3
There is a picture of this SSW D III of KEST 5 at Lahr in the Propellerblatt No. 6.
Regards
Rainer
__________________
"Beware of the Hun in the sun!"
|
|
|
10 December 2009, 02:47 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Formerly London, now Kent
Posts: 146
|
I don't know if it helps but one of Dembrowsky and Eger is described as "Ostpreussen" in the copies of the records I have [Dembrowsky]. Eger is described as coming from "Leipzig".
__________________
"Hell hath no fury like a vested interest masquerading as a moral principle".
"Absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence".
|
|
|
10 December 2009, 02:47 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: St. Charles, Iowa
Posts: 3,626
|
Hallo Raineranton,
Thanks so much for that great information! I had forgotten about the photo in "Propellerblatt".
Thanks again.
Greg
__________________
Greg VanWyngarden
|
|
|
10 December 2009, 03:19 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikec
I don't know if it helps but one of Dembrowsky and Eger is described as "Ostpreussen" in the copies of the records I have [Dembrowsky]. Eger is described as coming from "Leipzig".
|
Leipzig is and was in Saxony, so Dembrowsky seems to be the hottest candidate who served in this Regiment.
Rainer
__________________
"Beware of the Hun in the sun!"
|
|
|
10 December 2009, 08:44 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
|
Ssw d.iii1618/18.
Hi Peter_T1958:
The information I have on Siemens Schuckert orders show that SSW D.III1600/18 to 1629/18 were all D.III machines, no D.IV aircraft in this order. The first SSW D.IV order from a partial order for 117 aircraft. Thirty SSW D.3000/18 to D.3026/18 were ordered as D.III aircraft, the remaining 87 on the order, D,3027/18 to D.3057/18 and D.3060/18 to D.3109/18 were ordered as SSW D.IV aircraft.
Merry Christmas Peter,
Dan-San
|
|
|
14 December 2009, 11:30 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 106
|
Gentlemen, thanks al lot!
Now I'm slowly getting a picture of the situation in November 1918.
@Raineranton and micek.
Ok, than this must be the D.III, 1618/18 piloted Dembrowsky. He damaged his aircraft while landing (look at the broken off propeller blades).
@ Dan-San
In another thread you wrote that the 5 tone lower Lozenge was on the upper side of this aircraft. Strange, but obviously reality. I played around with photoshop: Is it that, what you mean, Dan-San
Right flap …
About the same dimensions …
Merry Christmas and a happy New Year, Dan-San
Peter
|
|
|
14 December 2009, 04:03 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Formerly London, now Kent
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_T1958
Gentlemen, thanks al lot!
Now I'm slowly getting a picture of the situation in November 1918.
@Raineranton and micek.
Ok, than this must be the D.III, 1618/18 piloted Dembrowsky. He damaged his aircraft while landing (look at the broken off propeller blades).
Peter
|
I believe my grandfather’s SSW DIII might have been similarly damaged on landing since it too had broken propellers, and also had it’s wings and tail removed. My understanding is that the more badly damaged SSWs were used by the Swiss as a source of spare parts, so as to allow the planes which were in better condition to fly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_T1958
In regard to the upcoming article, I still don't want to forestall anything, but what confuses me, is the number associated with Beckhardt’s machine: 8340/17.I am not really interested in Beckhardt’s SSW D.III as it landed in Rapperswil. (BTW: Absolute impossible to do a model with a swastika in Switzerland today!!!)
Nevertheless that classification in Swiss archives lead to the following list:
8340/17 Beckhardt
8344/17 Eger
8356/17 Lange*
1618/18 Dembrowsky
Peter
|
Just to clarify Peter; are you saying there is documented evidence in the Swiss Archives that Beckhardt’s plane was 8340/17? I ask because as you know, in the Swiss Army report on the 13th and14th November landings, dated 22nd November, his plane is recorded as 8356/17.
So far as I know, it is not known which German unit 8340/17 was assigned to. Hopefully the experts here will correct me if I'm wrong.
Mike C.
__________________
"Hell hath no fury like a vested interest masquerading as a moral principle".
"Absence of evidence is not the same as evidence of absence".
|
|
|
15 December 2009, 11:08 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,349
|
ANY final guess as to the Black/White Totenkopf Serial number ?
D.8356/17 has it been generaly aggreed upon ?
Also any ideas here IF the Fuselage (D.1618/18) was the standard Dark Stained Wood here for this one and what colors the Crest may have been ? Gold ? White with black detail ?
Inquistive minds want to know ?
BTW Pete I look forward to the Better Resoultion Photo posts of the Totenkopf ? I like that profile and I am trying to draw it. I think from the Photos it appears it was painted slightly differently from the Left side and the right side.
Yours Mike
__________________
"Art is never finished, only abandoned." Leonardo Da Vinci
|
|
|
18 December 2009, 09:18 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 106
|
Hi Mike
Sorry for being late with my answer. Until now I didn’t have received any reply from the author of the article. The article will be published by end of December. The scans have not been delivered too. I have to wait …
Here a picture of the so called Offiziers-Schulterstücke. They are similar to the epaulette badge of the Grenadier-Regiment König Friedrich Wilhelm I.
Gold would therefore be a good option…
Isn't it a bit insane to ask, whether they already had golden colors in that time? If so I would go with that. The officer epaulettes were made of golden filament on silvery background.
Greetings from Schaffhausen, Peter
|
|
|
18 December 2009, 10:37 AM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,349
|
Yeah I would venture a guess they had Gold Paint in 1918. Actually the photo is a big help. Look forward to both the articcle and photos.
thanks for posting.
__________________
"Art is never finished, only abandoned." Leonardo Da Vinci
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:21 AM.
|