1 April 2012, 01:05 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 114
|
Hi All
While the French may well had the technology for Wireless Telephony, after the Du Peuty document relating to Verdun it appears to disappear from later documents, at least in the air to ground sense. Maj. Walser of 4 Sqn. RFC attended a French Course at Beauvais from 15 to 30 December 1916. This was to exchange ideas from each French Army on the use of aviation. Walser not only attended he also gave talks on the RFC procedures and organisation. His notes on the course were sent to HQRFC and were then disseminated to the RFC Brigades (TNA, AIR 1/997/204/5/1241). In the section on 'Wireless' only mentions 'wireless telegraphy', I would have thought 'wireless telephony' would have been of great interest to the RFC, so I can only presume it was not discussed. It was considered that the French wireless organisation was inferior to the RFC, mainly because the French wireless stations with their artillery were manned and controlled by the artillery not the air arm. The document also lists the 'wireless failures' that had arisen, these were; "Ineffiency of Observers in sending. Use of the same type of wireless set throughout the squadrons resulting in jamming. Insufficient difference in wave lengths. Signals long and cumbersume and sent without break for long periods. Machines working too near the line and thus close to each other."
These are their reported problems at the time.
We should also remember that the British ground troop's trench wireless could give probles to the RFC receiving sets with the artillery. The RFC had to locate their sets at least 1500 yards away from the trench sets to avoid jamming in 1918.
I hope that is of interest.
Mike
|
|
|