










|
| Camouflage and Markings Topics related to the camouflage and markings of WWI aircraft |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
24 May 2005, 02:21 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,595
|
USAS Fokkers
Perhaps we should have a separate forum for Camouflage and Markings, but I'll try this one in the Models department ...
There's a well-known photograph of a late-Alb. Fokker D.VII in 9th Aero markings, and the overall color is light and reflective. It's usually described as grey, but it looks like a dirty aluminum color to me. Has anyone seen any other pictures of this bird? It looks like the wing crosses were maintained despite the overall paint job. Did it ever sport USAS star roundels?
While I'm at it, I've seen pictures of other USAS Fokkers in overall olive drab, with the USAS star roundels on backwards. Why is this?
|
|
|
24 May 2005, 03:00 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Fly a Sopwith Dunny...
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: On a big black BMW
Posts: 3,530
|
I moved this to here. Think you will get the answers you need from this forum.
__________________
My Scale Model site ...
My Motorcycle Blog.
"...you can never be too dogmatic about WWI finishes." the voice of reason..
Quote:
|
von Richthoven: How lucky you English are to find the toilet so amusing. For us, it is a mundane and functional item. For you, the basis of an entire culture.
|
|
|
|
24 May 2005, 05:19 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
When you say the USAAS stars were reversed, do you mean the colors were reversed? If that's the case, it could just be the difference between orthochromatic and panchromatic film. Some early film made the darker colors (e.g. blue) appear lighter than some of their counterparts (e.g. red). I hope you find this helpful.
Brian da Basher
|
|
|
|
24 May 2005, 05:33 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,595
|
Reversed
Sorry, I meant that the stars were pointing backwards
|
|
|
24 May 2005, 08:03 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Shot Down
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,778
|
The late build Fokker D.VII (Alb.) 6722/18 was on the rolls of the 9th Aero sqdn equipment accountability in Jan. 1919. It was over painted white and reasonably stained. The image you mention was first published as a front cover for the Cross & Cockade USA Vol. 16 #4. The original can be found in the National Archives in record group # 18. This machine is the subject of a diorama I did titled; "Our best man is working the problem..." It depicts a pair of AEF officers walking toward the machine, talking and on the other side a German POW mechanic is being helped by his "not so armed guard" to pour Benzine in the fuel tank. When many of the Fokker D.VII types were handed over they had partially filled fuel tanks. The AEF daily air service operation procedures required that each machine's fuel cell / tank be topped off. Each production of the Mercedes 180 - 200hp inline six had specific fuel mix requirements for max performance. Several American pilots learned the hard way that the Benzine could not be replaced by fuel normally used by the AEF. There are several accounts where the fuel toleration by a specific engine could be rated as needing high octane or low octane tractor fuel. I suspect that the 200hp was the less tolerant and demanded higher octane.
On the other Fokker types in allied hands ...unknown about the stars... but, if they stacked the wing on the leading edge then the trailing edge would have been pointing up. So naturally the star might have been painted with the point to the rear. Just a thought.
Last edited by StephenLawson; 25 May 2005 at 07:41 PM.
|
|
|
24 May 2005, 08:07 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 692
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ross_Moorhouse
I moved this to here. Think you will get the answers you need from this forum. 
|
LOL on the monty python. I cannot remember the clip....is it "ministry of silly walks?"
|
|
|
24 May 2005, 09:23 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,595
|
White?
Sure looks white in the posted picture -- in Peter Gray's "Fokker Fighters" booklet there are some reflective things going on in the same picture that make me think of dull aluminum dope.
|
|
|
25 May 2005, 03:56 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,595
|
more pix
Might be a dirty distemper white, but there's too much difference between the true whites of the insigina and the overall "color." Also, the wheel discs are definitely a darker shade.
Are there any other pictures of this bird?
Last edited by buzz1941; 25 May 2005 at 05:24 PM.
|
|
|
26 May 2005, 03:23 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Colors and light.....why oh why did they not have color film in WWI ?
Ever try to separate navy blue from black under neon lighting?
There is a movie with a shot of a "2 seat DVII" sliding in a lake. The plane was argent in color even in b& w.
|
|
|
|
11 June 2005, 07:57 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wingstrutdotcom
LOL on the monty python. I cannot remember the clip....is it "ministry of silly walks?"
|
The argument clinic. ( no it isn't!)( yes it is!)
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:23 PM.
|