










|
| Camouflage and Markings Topics related to the camouflage and markings of WWI aircraft |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
24 April 2006, 09:01 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schorndorf - Germany
Posts: 2,489
|
Rudder crosses on Fokker E.III´s
Hello Folks,
did anyone ever make a study with dimensional drawings or sketches of the crosses as have been painted to Fokker monoplanes of the E.III type?
This would safe me some hours if someone could help me out with that.
Thank you!
Cheers!
Achim
|
|
|
24 April 2006, 10:14 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
|
E.III rudder cross.
Achim :
The rudder on a Fokker E.III was 600 high and wide, centered 450 mm from the top of the rudder. The end of the arm was 240mm, 120mm either side of the center-line. the radius of the arms were 780mm.
Blue skies,
Dan-San
Last edited by Dan_San_Abbott; 24 April 2006 at 10:31 PM.
|
|
|
26 April 2006, 01:56 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schorndorf - Germany
Posts: 2,489
|
Is there a list of serial and military numbers available somewhere?
I would like to know what military number Fokker E.III serial number 490 has.
Are there any known photographs of that very plane or is the history known?
Thank you!
Cheers!
Achim
|
|
|
26 April 2006, 02:27 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
|
What is w.n.490??
Achim Engel:
W.n. 490 is Fok.E.III/16.
Blue skies,
Dan-San
|
|
|
26 April 2006, 03:08 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schorndorf - Germany
Posts: 2,489
|
I may not have been that clear:
Fokker E.III 419/15 was factory serial number 401.
Factory number 490 would than be either
419 + 89 = 508/15
or
??(?)/16
Achim Engels
|
|
|
27 April 2006, 02:34 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
|
w.n.490?
Achim Engels:
Fokker.W.N.490 is Fok.E.III 194/16 This is from Douglas Pardee's listing.
Blue skies,
Dan-san
|
|
|
27 April 2006, 08:09 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,609
|
Weren't there two different types of E.III crosses?
|
|
|
28 April 2006, 11:35 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schorndorf - Germany
Posts: 2,489
|
Hello Baldeagle,
you are correct. There have been in use at least two different style stencils for the cross layout at Fokker´s paint shop.
They did appearently did not care much about which plane carried what style of cross during the production run. The later style was used mixed up along with the older style.
Cheers!
Achim
|
|
|
30 April 2006, 02:29 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
|
Correct cross form>
Achim Engels:
The earlier cross form was used last on w.n 479. Commencing with the February 1916 order for 60 Fok.E.III 190 to 249/16, w.n.482 and subsequent w.n. the standard cross form was used.
You are welcome.
blue skies,
Dan-San
|
|
|
30 April 2006, 09:03 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schorndorf - Germany
Posts: 2,489
|
What is the reason to tell us 479 was the last one that had the "old" style crosses? Obviously 488 still also had them. And 401 already had the "new" style crosses painted on.
Was 401 built after 488? Or was it just marked after 488?
However, these crosses can hardly be 600mm in square.
Last edited by AchimEngels; 30 April 2006 at 09:29 PM.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:19 AM.
|