hallo,
i based my covering practise on several dokuments and facts.
first i have a original siderudder which give a very good clue to the system they used and i have fotos from the oeffag factory indicating that they did not use ribtapes usually.
i enclose two pictures from my archive to show this. one is from the testing center aspern showing two ailerons tested to destruction and the other one is the storage room of the oeffag factory . the picture is taken at the very end of the war or probably short after.
i am convinced that they did not use ribtapes on the printed camouflage fabric also . why should they change there practise?
technically ribtapes are more important for longivety than for strength.
the very accurate and thight stiching and the glueing effect of the dope are more than adequat to hold everything in place. i learned it the hard way when i have to redo a tailplane and have to cut every single thred otherwise i would have destroyed the ribs. ribtapes are certainly a good idea if you expect a longer service life out of your plane. oeffag took great care of making the wing airthight so that the airstream does not pump up the wing which is the biggest problem for that kind of design and obviously they did not have problems in service. at least i could not find anything in the documents.
it is interesting to note that austrian authorities obviously accept a lot of different ways to attach fabric. some producers used nails coverd with tape.
the biggest problem was the quality of the covering material . this seems to be very low later in the war and several manufactures reported big problems as also frontline reports indicate this. although oeffag seems to be in a better position and had probably secured supply before it was getting worth.
the original fabric sample i have is from a very early D III and is of incredible high quality linnen.
the finest picture i have showing printed fabric
hope this helps
cheers
koloman mayrhofer