










|
| Camouflage and Markings Topics related to the camouflage and markings of WWI aircraft |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
30 December 2008, 07:54 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 557
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mode One
Fly paper, Yes, thank you very much for this wonderful database of information! Are you saying these colors (rather range of colors) apply to the Neiuport 28, also?
I wonder whether in the "Fog of War", following some defined regulation on the mixing of pigments to attain a specific color, wasn't given up for peace time! It would make sense to me, that for expedience sake, there were only general guidlines as to how to mix, hence the differences.
|
Hello Mode One,
The range of colors came from the sampling of actual remnants from WWI Spads, but the same colors were used on the N28 and in fact on other French aircraft. So yes they were used.
The difference in certain shades comes from the fact that, for example, more "green" samples still existed to be studied. I'm sure that some of the difference in shades was as you said caused by the "rush" to get the product to the aircraft builders.
Today most people "agree" that the middle of each color range is the average color used.
Hope I've been of some help
Flypaper
|
|
|
30 December 2008, 08:16 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 223
|
Yes, thanks and again, thanks for all your hard work!!
__________________
Mode One,
|
|
|
30 December 2008, 07:12 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,120
|
Alan's posting??
Flypaper:
Could you direct me to Alan's long posting, I am unable to find it.
Seasons Greeting,
Dan-San
|
|
|
30 December 2008, 07:49 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SISTERS,OREGON U.S.A.
Posts: 4,382
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flypaper
Here are layouts of two of the more popular 5 color French camo schemes. By the way the wing roundels were not matte but had a sheen that equaled that of the rest of the aircraft.
Flypaper
|
Greetings Flypaper,
As others have already stated, Thanks for sharing your hard work and years of research with us. I also find the "cross hatched" and differently shaded Black and White Spad camouflage diagrams a real pain in the arse!
They do work when you are ready to use them for the painting process, but these color diagrams are invaluable for the research process.
I also believe that there are at least three common Maker's schemes, but can often only find the two, Bleriot and Kellner.
 
These are a great reference that can only be improved upon with the third Maker's camouflage scheme.
Great work and Happy New Years, FOKKERJ
|
|
|
27 January 2009, 08:30 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Observer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mode One
Fly paper, Yes, thank you very much for this wonderful database of information! Are you saying these colors (rather range of colors) apply to the Neiuport 28, also?
I wonder whether in the "Fog of War", following some defined regulation on the mixing of pigments to attain a specific color, wasn't given up for peace time! It would make sense to me, that for expedience sake, there were only general guidlines as to how to mix, hence the differences.
|
There is on display at the San Diego Aerospace Museum the original fabric of a 94th Nie 28. I believe the above information is well within the range of "correct"
to "dead on" as far as I can tell. Especially regarding the addition of aluminum to the base colors.
|
|
|
27 January 2009, 10:14 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 126
|
Thanks for this info Flypaper. 45 years in the making, you are a patient man. Well done.
|
|
|
27 January 2009, 06:29 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 557
|
Thanks ^ but as i said the real research was done by Mr. Toelle, all I did was buy a cart load of model paints and match whats in the bottle to what Mr.T learned...but I have to say ...it was fun! And now I more than likely have the biggest collection of green model paint on Long Island ! 
|
|
|
27 January 2009, 07:09 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 557
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sreiko
|
Interesting article but there is one important mistake in it. The paints with the aluminum powder was NOT used on the metal areas....a completely different paint with no powder was used on the metal parts....and that also included the metal panel on the top wing.
Flypaper
|
|
|
27 January 2009, 07:11 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Serbia
Posts: 2,315
|
I know that metal powdered paint was used on the fabric areas only. It might to be that I have make some typing error. Would you be kind to quote part of text where I have make error?
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM.
|