12 June 2012, 08:01 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 130
|
In memorabilia there are various levels of what is "right". Think of it as "most right", "right", "less right", a "lot less right", etc., before you finally end up at outright "wrong". "Most right" would be clear provenance attaching this pin to a particular named pilot. Relatively little in the WW1 aviation collecting world today meets that goal. Next would be an item that could be verified to have been "a" pilot's pin, even if the pilot's name is lost. Something less than that might be an item known to have come from the military aviation supply system, but which may or may not have ever actually been issued. Each level has a different level and type of provenance required, and each are valued differently.
As to your pin, Jim is correct: you aren't going to be able to establish it was, in fact, used by a particular, or any, French pilot, nor can you even show it to have come from the French aviation supply system. But you may be able to establish that it truly is a Bijou Fix wing from the period and not just a 2010 knock off that doesn't even look much like the true Fix wing (the bottom level of "wrong"). A period Fix pin would constitute an authentic example of a piece of costume jewelry popularly used by French pilots as an unofficial wing badge. Its not as good as saying this was actually used by a French pilot, but it still holds some value, both financial and intrinsic. Indeed, most private purchase goggles, flying coats, helmets, gauntlets, etc., are bought and sold on that basis every day, so it does potentially have some merit as "a generic example", even if you cannot identify the specific history of the piece.
Probably not what you wanted to hear, but neither is it nearly so bleak as it might have seemed at first blush.
__________________
Strategic Air Command
Peace was our profession: war was just a hobby.
Last edited by wingandprop; 12 June 2012 at 08:09 PM.
|
|
|