Quote:
Originally posted by StephenLawson+Sep 4 2004, 03:36 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (StephenLawson @ Sep 4 2004, 03:36 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Intrepid@Sep 3 2004, 02:13 PM
[b] '...There are some differences between my model and the current way of thinking regarding the colours and markings. When I built this model it was based on the way of thinking of that time period...'
|
Intrepid please describe the differences for those of us that have an interest in such nuiances![/quote]
The differences were:
the red stripes on the top surface of the top wing were not there.
Confirmed by photo you posted.
The second photo you posted shows the red stripes on the bottom of the top wing though.
By early April 1918 ,the black rudder outline was also no longer present.
Also confirmed by the first photo.
In May 1918 this unit's triplane crosses were again modified to conform with the 1:4 ratio directed by Kogenluft. Imrie notes the tailplane cross was still visible at this time.
The profile by Harry Dempsey in" Fokker Dr.1 Aces of World War 1" also differs in that he has depicted the interplane struts, landing gear struts as in turquoise blue. The cabane struts are depicted as in black and white.
I am also leaning towards much greener finishes on Fokker triplanes. I personally really like the new colour triplane profiles by Ray Rimmel in "Jagdstaffel 5 " vol 2.