Here is where we disagree.My wife says that the guns look out of place,are painted too bright and they look phony.
I say that is what they are supposed to look like, because if you read the sign on the airplane it says, "Reid and Sons Flying Circus".During airshows of this era they often had fake dogfights and I think the guns fit right in.They were fake and made from tin.The colors are bright because in an air circus you would want to emphasize this aspect of the show.It is an air circus after all.To further emphasize this ,I am also thinking of painting the wheels two different colors like the Jenny inside the hangar.
She says that the viewers eye is drawn directly to the guns and downplays everything else.I say that that is just what I want to do, grab the viewers attention on the L/H side first.I think that when the viewer reads the sign on the airplane it will make sense.(Reid and Sons also like a little free publicity when they can get it)
I took the "Pickford-Fairbanks" sign off the tail to save any confusion, and put it over on the crate for the wings, with a sign reading "Ship To:" on top.
Any further address would be redundant in that era as it was the most famous studio in Hollywood.
Although the airplane is a Camel it could have participated in air circuses of the time but I haven't any direct evidence that they did so.The airplane also could have been at a university ,as some were shipped to Canada for use in the new aeronautical field of study.If by that time the airplane was unflyable ,Reid & Sons could have acquired it and used it for publicity, dragging it through the local cities and towns, with or without the wings,which was often done. They are now shipping it to Hollywood for use as a prop for an upcoming movie production.
What do you guys think??