










|
| Models Topics related to WWI aircraft models. Forum is closed for posting. |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
2 October 2004, 02:13 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Stockport UK
|
Roden SE5a
Well, I've got mine. First thing to say is that there is not, contrary to what I said elsewhere, a decal option with a big G on the side. Sorry Ginge, that must be on the Hisso version. Mine is the Wolseley version, kit number 416, which interestingly is the kit number Hannants are currently listing for the Hisso engined model.(?)
It does look extremely nice in the box. Detail is refined and the overall impression very clean. The wings are much better than the recent Eduard Camel and do not feature separate control surfaces. Animated ailerons are something of a hobby horse for me, you just don't often see them deflected in real life. Elevators and rudder are though separate parts and very fine they are too. Fuselage detail is also subtle and the lacing is particularly well done.There are no sink marks on any of the major parts.
There are two props, left and right handed, one of which is presumably for a future release. There are also two Lewis guns with separate drums and two Foster mounts to accomodate the different thrust lines and prop diametres of the selected variant. Smaller detail parts are crisply moulded.
Decal options are; Beauchamp-Proctor's D6856, 84 Sqn. Bishop's C1904, 85 Sqn. Mannock's E1295, 74 Sqn. The decals are semi gloss and, given Roden's record in this area, I shall test a a surplus item before touching any of those I intend to use.
This is a good one guys, everything we hoped it would be. I may have to build this one  But I won't be going near any drawings, it looks perfect just the way it is.
__________________
cheers
Peter L
Last edited by PeterL; 3 October 2004 at 02:11 AM.
|
|
|
2 October 2004, 03:01 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Gardner, Kansas
Posts: 1,086
|
I would really like to see a early S.E. 5 like 56 Sq had in April-May 1917.
__________________
Richard Schrader
|
|
|
2 October 2004, 03:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Shot Down
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,778
|
The initial issue has decals and profiles for the late version airframe with the 220hp Woseley Viper engine. BUT ...you will find on the trees, the engine heads, radiator, propellors, Lewis guns, cowling hoods, exhausts and upper forward fuselage decks for the 220hp Woseley Viper AND the 200hp Hispano - Suiza versions as well. Yet this kit differs from the most recent Roden kits in that it does not have the full engine present. To many it would be a small effort to fully recreate the cylinder banks and crank case. The over all subtle detail contributes greatly to the over-all look. This is a great kit!
Last edited by StephenLawson; 4 October 2004 at 07:44 AM.
|
|
|
2 October 2004, 03:15 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Stockport UK
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Richard_Schrader
I would really like to see a early S.E. 5 like 56 Sq had in April-May 1917.
|
Looking at the break down and distribution of the parts on the sprue it would certainly be possible to grant your wish. While not suggesting for a moment that Roden intend to do any such thing, the fuselage is contructed in such a way that the nose and the cockpit section could be changed completely by swapping a few gates prior to molding. More likely it's done this way to facilitate the Hisso version however. Wings would remain square tipped, not uncommon but perhaps not what you or I would regard as typical SE5.
__________________
cheers
Peter L
Last edited by PeterL; 2 October 2004 at 03:34 PM.
|
|
|
2 October 2004, 03:37 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Shot Down
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,778
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Richard_Schrader
I would really like to see a early S.E. 5 like 56 Sq had in April-May 1917.
|
Greetings Richard with the initial issue of twenty four airframes (A4545 -A4568) then from (A 8898 - A8922) were all SE 5 types. From A8923 on and machines from other manufacturers were SE 5a.
The RAF drawings say that it was the wing modifications that denoted the difference between SE 5 & Se5a.
Yet the Air Board Miinistry says it was ...
I. 150hp Hispano Suiza = SE 5.
II.200hp Hispano - Suiza = SE 5a.
Also the 150hp Hisso was replaced in many airframes when the 200hp variant became available. I have not been able to find any reference where the wings were modified when the engines were swapped.
References;
“British Fighter Units 1917-18" by A. Revell, Osprey Pub. Ltd. 1978.
“Fighting Fifty Six” by A. Revell, Aeroplane Monthly Pp. 591 - 596, Nov. 1976
“S.E. 5 Fighter Supreme” by J.M. Bruce, Aeroplane Monthly Pp. 264 - 269, May 1977
“S.E. 5 Fighter Supreme” by J.M. Bruce, Aeroplane Monthly Pp. 327 - 331, June 1977.
“S.E. 5 Fighter Supreme” by J.M. Bruce, Aeroplane Monthly Pp. 355 - 360, July 1977.
“S.E. 5 Fighter Supreme” by J.M. Bruce, Aeroplane Monthly Pp. 437 - 442, August 1977.
“S.E. 5 Fighter Supreme” by J.M. Bruce, Aeroplane Monthly Pp. 493 - 498, September 1977.
RAF SE 5a by J.M. Bruce, Datafile Special, Windsock pub.1993.
Royal Flying Corps in WWI by R. Rimell, Osprey Vintage Warbirds series #1, 1985.
The SE 5 by J.M. Bruce, Profile Publications #103, 1966.
The SE 5a by J. M. Bruce, Profile Publications #1, 1964.
|
|
|
2 October 2004, 03:46 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Gardner, Kansas
Posts: 1,086
|
Peter & Stephan;
Thank you for the information.
__________________
Richard Schrader
|
|
|
2 October 2004, 09:18 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NC USA
Posts: 1,467
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StephenLawson
The initial issue has decals and profiles for the late version airframe with the 220hp Woseley Viper engine. BUT ...you will find on the trees, the engine heads, radiator, propellors, Lewis guns, cowling hoods, exhausts and upper forward fuselage decks for the 220hp Woseley Viper AND the 200hp Hispano - Suiza versions as well. Yet this kit differs from the most recent Roden kits in that it does not have the full engine present. To many it would be a small effort to fully recreate the cylinder banks and crank case. The over all subtle detail contributes greatly to the over-all look. The master of this kit has nothing to apologize for. This is a great kit!
|
Are you saying you get the parts for building the Hisso version in this kit?
RAGIII
__________________
Ricks Axioms: "A mans got to know his limitations" Harry Callahan.
"Don't slop it on" Lynda Geisler
|
|
|
2 October 2004, 11:25 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Stockport UK
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RAGIII
Are you saying you get the parts for building the Hisso version in this kit?
RAGIII
|
Some , but not all, of the parts for the Hisso version are present. The kit is to be released with the full compliment of alternate parts at a later date. The SE5 should be a feasible conversion project from there but it's impossible to say for sure without the dog having first seen the rabbit.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by StephenLawson
..Air Board Miinistry says it was ...
I. 150hp Hispano Suiza = SE 5.
II.200hp Hispano - Suiza = SE 5a.
|
That's certainly my understanding. I imagine that the attachments etc were the same for both types of wing and that, in theory, on the SE5 wings might even be interchangable. Although it must have been one-way traffic if that was indeed the case.
__________________
cheers
Peter L
Last edited by PeterL; 3 October 2004 at 01:05 AM.
|
|
|
3 October 2004, 08:02 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NC USA
Posts: 1,467
|
Just out of curiosity, is the Head Rest optional?
RAGIII
__________________
Ricks Axioms: "A mans got to know his limitations" Harry Callahan.
"Don't slop it on" Lynda Geisler
|
|
|
3 October 2004, 08:12 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Stockport UK
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RAGIII
Just out of curiosity, is the Head Rest optional?
RAGIII
|
I was glad to see that it is. Two of the decal options have no headrest and it would be a bugger to remove.
__________________
cheers
Peter L
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
SE5a 1/32 Roden
|
Kofoed |
Camouflage and Markings |
7 |
26 June 2007 03:20 PM |
|
Roden 1:72 SE5a
|
aviators6 |
Models |
6 |
13 August 2006 11:06 AM |
|
Roden SE5a
|
Carpo |
Models |
13 |
4 September 2005 10:25 PM |
|
Se5a 1/72 Roden Kit
|
wingstrutdotcom |
Models |
5 |
20 January 2004 09:10 AM |
|
Roden 1/72 SE5a
|
Scimitar |
Models |
33 |
13 February 2003 02:46 PM |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:26 PM.
|