Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jernst
Is there much difference between the Sopwith Schnieder and the Sopwith Baby? I could build the Special Hobby "Schnieder" as a "Baby".....
Again, showing my lack of knowledge....
Thanks.
|
jernst:
JM Bruce wrote in "Sopwith Baby" Windsock Datafile 60 that in the offical Admiralty lists of naval aircraft Nos. 1436-1447, 1556-1579 and 3707-3806 are designated Sopwith Schneider (Cup). Those numbered 8118 -8217 and subsequently, the new name Baby is recorded.
In the serial ranges of 8118-8122 and the 8187-8217 they were known as "Baby Mono" (100-hp Monosoupape) and 8123-8186 as "Baby Clerget" (110-hp Clerget 9Z).
Bruce noted that the Baby aircraft listed as being powered by the 100-hp Monosoupape retained the original (Schneider) fore-and-aft engine installation with it's characteristic hooded cowl.
The Baby aircraft equipped with the 110-hp Clerget 9Z on an overhung mounting had the open-fronted cowling of an horseshoe form with it's lowest quadrant open.
This series(8118-8217) had ailerons,with the enlarged tailplane and fin. Bruce also writes that at least some of the 3707 - 3806 Schneiders had enlarged fin and tailplanes. He also notes that it is unsure if this was an retrospective in service modification.
The early tailplane and fin in the Special hobbies Schneider kit is undersized according to the Ian Stair plans in the Datafile. The later enlarged tailplane and enlarged fin with rudder match up well with the Stair plans.
Datafile 60 has much information on the Schneider, Baby, and Hamble Baby and is worth the investment.
also recommended:
" Bombing up Baby" - Harry Woodman (Windsock International Vol 11 No.2)
" Sopwith Baby" - Colin A Owers ( Windsock International Vol.5 No.2)