Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Beto
Stereo pictures are easy to convert to mono.. .Once scanned, it's easy to substract one of the channels (red, green or blue) and get only one of the views of the stereo pair.
|
As a matter of fact, they are red/blue anaglyphs (I'm just learning about this stuff). I have Photoshop so what you describe should be very easy to accomplish. I'll give it a try -- thanks!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lufbery
An issue of Fine Scale Modeler featured a 1/72 scale WWI Zeppelin. It was NINE FEET LONG!
|
Yes, I happened to spot a reference to that somewhere and it turned out I had the issue in my archive. Feb 1990 and the fellow (Matt Hargreaves) lived in Seattle which is where I live now (small world!). His model was very impressive, though with the styrene frame probably quite heavy.
He used Econokote to cover the frame (Monokote only sticks to wood). I originally thought plastic film was the way to go as well, but I am now thinking tissue will yield just the right scale look, texture and feel and will be much easier to control when applying. It will also be easier to hide the seams I would think.
Matt's model, though very large, was somewhat lacking in detail, probably due to lack of reference (it was the '80s and no Internet!). If you compare his model to the much smaller Hippo Models 1/144 scale WWI-era Zeppelin you can see how much detail he did not include.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lufbery
In any event, I like the computer model. Did you model the rigid structural elements as well?
|
Yes and no. I figured out the interior structure and modeled what was necessary, mainly the keel. The frame stations on this early model were quite crude and much of it was just wire rigging (i.e. stay wires). The hull on my model is divided into the proper number of sections even though that does not show in the render.
I could easily model the entire frame if I needed to. But my study model was built to help me get everything positioned and proportioned correctly and then to generate plan view drawings. So my models are built strictly as a pattern making tool and not really for "show" like most people would build in 3D.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed
Wouldn't a 1/144th scale be easier to get out the door? . . .I have 1/144th scale models of the giant clippers and other airliners and they're still pretty big in that scale.
|
That is too small IMHO. Most people look only at the length and then imagine a really huge model, when the thing is so slender that overall it is really not that large. Even a 6-7 foot Zeppelin model can be only 8 inches or so in diameter! So it's long but not really very big.
I did up a scale chart of every major rigid airship and plotted the sizes in 1/400, 1/350, 1/200, 1/144, and 1/72. (I'll be putting the entire chart on my new website in the not-so-distant future.) For this particular model, the figures are:
1/350 (a ship scale) 1' 5/8" long X 1 3/16" diam
1/144 2' 11" long X 3 1/4" diam
1/72 5' 10" long X 6 9/16" diam
So you see even at 1/72 it is less than 7 inches in diameter! Not very big at all.
I didn't plot 1/48 scale because the larger, later Zeppelins would be over 20 feet long which is really not practical. I would like to have all my models in the same scale, so at 1/72 the largest ones are just over 10 feet -- huge, yes, but not completely unmanageable.