Thanks Eric
Paul, the model, in card terms, is about a 4 or 5 out of 10 for difficulty.
There are a few things I'd change to make things a bit easier such as the way fuselage segments are joined. The great thing about digital kits like this is that should you mess up a part, you can always re-print it.
www.cardmodels.net is 100% geared to paper modeling. You can find a ton of info there. I've built this one a few times getting the paint just right so feel free to ask away here or send an email. I'm more than happy to help you through any of it.
I was freaked out by the scale as well. Most published card models these days come from old eastern bloc countries such as Poland, Czech Republic, Bulgaria and Russia. Someone explained to me that years ago (1950's and '60's) styrene kits were very expensive and not at all available to the average hobbyist in those countries. This was the way of getting models to the masses. They were printed as separate entities or as bonuses within technical magazines for students. These days, with CAD software and vector
graphics, it's not uncommon to see some kits with literally thousands of parts.
Over there, entire huge shows and competitions are mostly made up of card
models. So about the scale....it doesn't really answer the question but my guess is that's where it was derived from. With a digital kit such as this, scaling is a matter of scaling within any decent graphics software. This kit, as I mentioned, is vector, so you can make it as large or as small as you like without degrading graphics quality. There are guys that do these in paper so small you can place them on a coin. There are others that build them to fill their kitchens. As long as you print at a specific percentage and *not* 'fit to page' you will remain consistant and accurate.
Hope this helps
Ron