Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Baumann
hi FLUG WERKE thanks for your help glad to see you posted this  do you and the rest thank this is right for the Canberra lozenge doze it look or have the right feel, you know the top color has a blue green feel to it ..what doze the bottom look like from a distance ??
|
Doug, to my eye the version you've done the trace of on post 142 is pretty much on the money. I'm not sure how photoshop deals with it if you have colours simply overlapping as opposed to tracing a line in black. Where you've left the lines they still come across as being a touch too prominent. The lines should definitely be there and are typically around 4 to 9mm in width on the samples I've personally viewed, but the overlap zones aren't black, just noticeably darker than either colour in its own right.
As far as ageing is concerned, it's worth bearing in mind how rapid the turnover of aircraft
probably was. When you look at the expected combat lifespan of a pilot (one who makes it through the first 2 weeks learning curve), you'd have to believe that they'd wear out a few aircraft during their career. Technology is also rapidly advancing and the bar is continually being raised performance wise. Even the most long lived aircraft are unlikely to be exposed to the elements more than 6 months I'd guess. Dan probably has some data kicking about regarding how long the well known and long lived aces were flying particular serial number aircraft before they were issued a replacement. Suffice it to say that I doubt the duration of exposure would have been enough to cause massive fading. Some, sure, but lots? I'm less convinced.
That said, I was
very interested to see the sample of topside fabric posted up by odybvig in post 160. Looking at the fading of the purple lozenge down to a pale pink again makes me wonder about the "salmon" tapes being observed on samples... It seems like fairly stout evidence that even a fairly stout shade of purple tape can fade off to the salmon ballpark of the spectrum.
Regarding what the lower fabric looks like from a distance: In the same way as the main prominent feature of the topside fabric is the dark (almost black) blue lozenges with the rest of the print being
tonally pretty even, the yellow lozenges on the lowerside fabric seem to be the most prominent feature. Tonally the rest of the pattern is fairly well balanced in intensity whereas the yellow lozenges are noticeably lighter in tone.
Now the tricky bit: Given that many of the B&W shots of the era are on ortho film which skews red and yellow tones heavily towards black, exactly how underside 5 colour lozenge would look tonally in a photo I'm really not sure. In real life at close range (20 metres or so) the yellows are very obvioulsly the lightest of the pack. Not having access to anything flying with underside lozenge visible, I'm hard pressed to tell you what it looks like from a distance.
Lozenge seems to work when viewed at extreme distances and with something interesting going on in the eye brain that is probably best explained by an art lecturer well versed in the mechanics of pointilism such as the work of Georges Seurat. Suffice it to say that on a small static scale model plane, if viewed at anything closer than 5 metres, I suspect the effect will be that of nearfield viewing of lozenge, not the blending effect of farfield viewing...
Large scale flying models and full size airworthies it does seem to do its job. I've been told by a European replica vintage aero builder that getting good photos of one of the lozenge covered aircraft in their collection when it's airborne is nigh on impossible. Seems like the stuff
does work...