The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > Models


Models Topics related to WWI aircraft models. Forum is closed for posting.


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 June 2009, 09:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
MicroSculpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 527
 
Mirage 1/48 Halberstadt CL.II First Impressions

Greetings, everyone!

Well, I got my Mirage Halbie today from Roll Models and FWIW I thought I'd offer an opinion after I had a look at it.

I must say it is obvious that Piotr Zielinski has put a lot of time and effort into producing this kit. It is very nicely presented and Mirage deserves credit for bringing us a brand new 1/48 Halbie.

It comes in a good sturdy box with nice artwork on the cover. It is a hefty box, filled to the brim with sprues, decals (3 sheets), PE, acetate instrument faces and instructions.

The instructions are in the form of a small booklet — full color throughout. Like the latest WNW releases, it features some archival photos as well as some images of preserved/restored details. However, compared to the WNW instructions, the Mirage booklet is a bit small which reduces the value of the images somewhat.

The amount of detail the kit attempts to represent is impressive. There is some variation to the quality of the molded detail. Some is wonderfully crisp and some a little on the soft side. There is some flash here and there, but no unsightly ejector marks that I noticed. All parts look free of any distortion.

I must say that the rendition of the wings is among the very best I have ever seen. The rib stations are crisply delineated, the trailing edges are razor sharp and the unique features of this aircraft's wing structure accurately captured. The upper wing components match the Ian Stair drawings in the Windsock Datafile perfectly!

Unfortunately, I must say that not everything in the kit matches the drawings that perfectly. To me there are issues with the fuselage. For one thing the detail on the exterior of the fuselage sides is inaccurate. There are thick "tapes" on the upper and lower fuselages edges that are just not seen in photographs. The fuselage also seems to be too long and a bit too shallow when matched to the Windsock plans. It is difficult to tell at this point, but this may impact the nose contours.

The interior seems nicely detailed. I like the separate framing that gets added to the sides, and the bulk heads. This will look very crisp and dimensional.

The tail surfaces are very thinly molded. But, I'm not sure if that is accurate. The Windsock drawings show them a bit thicker. At any rate, it will be difficult to attach these parts — They are too thin to accept wire to aide in assembly. Again, these parts also do not match the Windsock drawings in outline — the horizontal stabilizer and elevator seem too large.

I really hate to be critical of any details of this kit because it is obvious that the designers tried very hard to create a good kit. One possibility is that the Windsock plans are wrong (gasp!) and the designers are right. I don't know. I just used what I had at hand to compare. If anyone knows what plans this kit is based on please chime in.

Overall, this is an impressive and very worthwhile kit in spite of the aforementioned issues (all of which can be addressed with some modeling skill). It is certainly the most detailed kit of this aircraft to-date. The wings are beautifully done, and there is potential here to make a real award-winning model. I look forward to building this kit and I hope Mirage will bring us more WWI subjects (perhaps a Hannover?).

Cheers!

Tom
MicroSculpt is online now  
Sponsored Links
Old 30 June 2009, 12:29 AM   #2 (permalink)
Observer
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 55
 
Dear Tom

thanks for the first impressions ! !

Realy nice i was also thinking to bye this kit !!

Regards David

Last edited by Dave83; 30 June 2009 at 12:35 AM.
Dave83 is offline  
Old 30 June 2009, 02:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Flamingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Glückstadt, Germany
Posts: 1,097
 
Thanks for the detailed review.

The Halb Cl.II is a good example not to rely on drawings!
The horizontal tailplane is drawn too small in span, later admitted by Ray, so the larger kit part is good news!
Compare with the photo on page 21 and try to establish the proportions.
Compare the kit fuselage with period photographs and study the walkarounds of the Krakow machine (Aircraft Color Profiles by Janusz Swiatlon)
to get an opinion of the kit's accuracy.

Never trust published drawings or dimensions without careful cross-checking, regardless of scource!
__________________
Joachim
Flamingo is offline  
Old 30 June 2009, 05:54 AM   #4 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
jsontag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 352
 
I too was thinking about buying this kit, and after reading what you said I think I will buy it now. Thanks.
jsontag is offline  
Old 30 June 2009, 06:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Tripehound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 221
 
Just went to the above link. The tailplane is THIN!
Tripehound is offline  
Old 2 July 2009, 10:54 AM   #6 (permalink)
Observer
 
GarrardA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 79
 
Here's a few shots I made of the kit. Got mine earlier in the week on EBay for $56 and $6.50 SH.

Overly pleased. Especially like the seperate fuselage framework as well as the wing jig.

Cheers, Gary Adams
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC00877.jpg (48.7 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00880.jpg (50.9 KB, 70 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00873.jpg (48.4 KB, 68 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00886.jpg (47.4 KB, 70 views)
File Type: jpg DSC00883.jpg (52.0 KB, 65 views)

Last edited by GarrardA; 2 July 2009 at 10:55 AM. Reason: added name
GarrardA is offline  
Old 2 July 2009, 06:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
BLOWHARD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round on the ends and high in the middle
Posts: 801
 
Just to throw one more voice in here; those Windsock drawings ARE NOT correct
__________________
Dave, I.P.M.S. 16124
BLOWHARD is offline  
Old 3 July 2009, 03:29 AM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
MicroSculpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 527
 
Windsock plans

Glad to hear that the Windsock plans are (gasp) NOT accurate.

I've compared the kit fuselage to photos and it appears to follow them closely. The forward fuselage agrees well. The fuselage still may be a bit long from the rear gunners cockpit to the horizontal stabilizer. But that could be distortion in the photo.

Tom
MicroSculpt is online now  
Old 3 July 2009, 08:27 AM   #9 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
BLOWHARD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round on the ends and high in the middle
Posts: 801
 
I just got my kit yesterday. I'll post my own review soon. On a glance it looks like Piotr drawings compare very well to Dan-San Abbott's drawings. I've got quite a lot of research built up for the CL.II profile I'm working on. Once I've gone over it all I'll put in my own take on the kit.
__________________
Dave, I.P.M.S. 16124
BLOWHARD is offline  
Old 4 July 2009, 07:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
Rest in Peace
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
 

My Gallery
Halb. Cl.II drawing.

Hi Tom:
I would not classify the Datafile drawings of the Halb.Cl.II, as accurate. On a scale of 1 to 10 , they are a 5 at best. I refer to those drawings as quick and dirty. I have that kit and I would say Poitr Mrozowski did a damned good job on outline and details. Further, if this was in 1/32 scale, it would be on a par with Wingnut Wings. The instructions are excellent. It is the best 1/48 scale kit I have seen! Finally, someone got the lower wing rightThe trailing edge is curved, not straight, curved! All the mouldings are clean a crisp, just like Wingnut Wings.
From his photos and the interior detailing, I could do a a very accurate structural drawing. Compare his details to my drawings in SCHLACHTFLIEGER! what the hell, I can't knock the Poitr, He has used SCHLACHTFLIEGER! as a reference.
Blue skies Tom,
Dan-San
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
 

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome