The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Other WWI Aviation


Other WWI Aviation Airfields, equipment, tactics, uniforms and all other WWI aviation topics


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 May 2003, 01:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Barrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 4,809
 
Dang, that's real Douhet end-of-the-world stuff. Imagine what Spielberg and ILM could do with that concept!
I'd imagine that the supercharged LePeur ship would've been hastened into production as a counter to Zeps but probably not soon enough to make a big difference.
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
Barrett is offline  
Old 7 May 2003, 06:42 AM   #12 (permalink)
Kory_Clark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
WOW

Can anyone further speculate as to why they did not carry this out? It seems like a gimme.

Could someone have been so insightful as to foresee that the U.S would have just increased their involvment?

Great posts guys, thanks.
 
Old 7 May 2003, 07:20 AM   #13 (permalink)
Rest in Peace
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
 

My Gallery
Kory Clark:
After the loss of Peter Strasser on the L70 on 6 August 1918, he was the head of the German Naval Airship Division, the offensive heart went out of Airhip Division. A new dynamic leader was needed.
Blue skies,
Dan-San
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 7 May 2003, 11:12 AM   #14 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Vigilant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Devon
Posts: 979
 
The SE5a had a ceiling of 22,000 ft. I expect we could have sold you some on lend-lease or something similar When the R-34 made the crossing in July 1919 it needed continuous radio fixes and weather reports. Without these, I should think the German loss rate would have been grim.

Vig.
__________________
Fly a microlight - http://www.bmaa.org
Vigilant is offline  
Old 7 May 2003, 02:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
Rest in Peace
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
 

My Gallery
Vigilant:
* There are a couple of problems here,
1. while negotiations were taking place, 1 to 2 years, I don't think the Airship Division were going to wait.
2. After we got the drawings, we would scratch ourselves and a year later we would start building them. (Remember the US D.H.4).
3. The British R-34 was copied from the L49 which forced landed in France on 20 October 1917. This illustrates the capability of the earlier "u" types which only had a useful lift of 87200 lbs., a service ceiling of 20,000 ft. and full speed endurance of 7600 miles, with 5 engines, the 240 PS Maybach HSLu. The "x" types had a better engine, 245 PS Maybach MbIVa high altitude engine, and the useful lift of 112700 lbs and a service ceiling much higher than the service ceiling of the S.E.5a. Also they carried oxygen for the crew members.
*The problem is at that time we did not have any aeral defenses, because we had the Atlantic Ocean between the US and Europe, we felt we did not need any aerial defenses. *If we had the defense against air attack, we would not know they here until the bombs exploded. Then we would have responded, by which time they would be on their way back to Germany. *
The problems for the airship crews would have been weather and engine failures. By 1918, the 245 PS Maybach MbIVa engines were quite reliable, but 8000 miles is long haul. They could have cruised on 5 of the 6 engines, and rested the engines in turn. Also they had the capability to repair engines in flight.
In regard to navigation, the German used radio stations in Germany to locate their position by triangulation. In addition, they could have used celestial navigation just like the steam ships.
If the German Airship Division had decided to try this in a Squadron action, they would have been very likely successful. They may have not all made the attack, however some of them would have been successful and made it back to Nordholz or Ahlhorn Airship Bases. *Had it been done, it would have caused reaction like Pearl Harbor!
* * * * * * * * * * * *Blue skies,
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *Dan-San
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 7 May 2003, 05:36 PM   #16 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Tailspin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 195
Assuming the weather is favorable and the airships successfully raid New York, Boston, Philadelphia and Washington (6 ships in total, 2 hitting New York and 2 hitting Philadelphia because they're bigger cities in 1918 and have major Naval Shipyards): I submit that there would be several reations. First, the political structure in the US would demand that a Home Defence Force be established to keep the Germans from doing it again. Secondly, the Air Service, particularly Colonel Mitchell, would clamour for a strategic bombing campaign to retaliate against Germany. Thirdly, Admiral Mahan and his supporters in the U.S. Navy would increase the volume of their platform to take the war to the German Navy, possibly bring about the conversion of several American aircraft carriers or a risky plan to steam the battle ships into harms way against the High Seas Fleet (with or without the British - these were a fairly zenophobic cast of characters).
I doubt the Wilson administration would permit the navy to act foolishly. (I hope not, my paternal grandfather was a Machinist Mate on an American destroyer). I do believe they'd allow Mitchell to retaliate. I also believe that the Home Defense squadrons would be established, the Germans would never come again, and all those planes would be diverted from the war effort.
Tailspin is offline  
Old 10 May 2003, 01:19 AM   #17 (permalink)
FrankHipper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
While I have no doubts as to the vehemence of an American reaction to New York or Boston being raided, I doubt Admiral Rodman would have taken the American squadron out to challenge the High Seas Fleet by it's lonesome. And aircraft carriers may have been a little to adventurous for the U.S. navy of the time. But the American public would have been HOWLING for some response, definetly!

Would anyone have any idea of where to point me to find some specs on the Poll Triplane? I know it was covered in The German Giants, but I haven't seen that book in close to twenty years.
 
Old 10 May 2003, 03:13 PM   #18 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Tailspin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 195
By all accounts, Admiral Rodman was a practical guy. By many accounts, Admiral Mahan was not. (He, who advocated sticking to large fleets of Pre-Deadnoughts and wanted the war taken to the enemy battle fleet at all costs, was somewhat contreversial). I agree that the Wilson Administration would not recklessly send the navy to Heligoland. The airplane was forced upon the Black Shoe Navy as it was. I wonder if this hypothetical raid would have accelerated the process?
Tailspin is offline  
Old 10 May 2003, 06:09 PM   #19 (permalink)
Rest in Peace
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,119
 

My Gallery
Tailspin:
What are the "several American carriers" you mentioned? I am quite curious.

Blue skies,
Dan-San
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 10 May 2003, 07:58 PM   #20 (permalink)
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Barrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 4,809
 
The US Navy didn't have an aircraft carrier until conversion of the collier Jupiter to USS Langley in 1922. In 1918 the only aircraft carrier afloat was HMS Furious, a hermaphrodite battlecruiser with "flying off" deck over the turrets and around the superstructure.
Ironically, up to 1917 the world leader in shipboard aviation was Russia, with more and better seaplane tenders than anyone!
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
Barrett is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
bomb, york



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Plattsburg New York 1915/16 ONEALM Other WWI Aviation 0 17 November 2004 09:57 AM
Michael York film... VonReichel Movies and Television 26 20 June 2004 11:32 AM
first bomb on U.K. Aviatik 2001 4 3 June 2001 12:40 PM
Visit to Manchester and York Reinout 2001 3 26 April 2001 11:44 PM
Rene Fonck's New York to Paris attempt cam 2000 1 26 March 2000 10:54 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome