










|
| People Topics related to WWI aviation personnel |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
6 April 2004, 08:00 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 4,809
|
Interesting to note that Fonck was known to the US Navy. His record (and something of his methods) appeared in a manual that I've seen from the late 20s or so--early in the days of carrier aviation. Wish I could find that volume again--one of many in the Shoulda Bought Dept.
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
|
|
|
6 April 2004, 10:24 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: St. Charles, Iowa
Posts: 3,626
|
Hi,
I agree with vb136; the title "Ace of Aces" was thought up by the people at Doubleday in the 1960's, long after Fonck's death. His own title for the book was 'Mes Combats'. Besides, he certainly was the Allied Ace of Aces, based on most criteria, just as Eddie Rickenbacker is called the American Ace of Aces (with more shaky criteria) and Francesco Baracca is the Italian ace of aces, etc. I imagine that's what the Doubleday people were getting at.
Fonck claimed a further 51 or 52 victories which were not credited under the strict French confirmation system, so he makes reference to (IIRC) 126 or 127 "victoires" in the book. Bill Bailey told me once that if the French system of confirmation had been as accepting of "out of controls" and 'moral victories', etc as the British (and indeed, the Americans) were, Fonck would have had his 126 victories, though don't quote me (or Bill) on that.
Greg
__________________
Greg VanWyngarden
|
|
|
7 April 2004, 07:31 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 346
|
Quote:
Originally posted by vb136@Apr 6 2004, 08:25 AM
[b]
However, following the death of Guynemer, neither Fonck nor any of the top French aces (Nungesser, Madon etc) received the same "worship" as Guynemer had been subjected to during his life-time or following his death.
|
I think that this was a phenomenom enjoyed by Albert Ball, in the RFC, as well. While a number of British pilots surpassed his record, I think he was the star turn to the men of the RFC and the British public. Although the Brits did not publicize their aces as did the Germans, French, etc., there is mention in the books about Ball referring to the many letters he received from adoring "fans". He personified the "offensive spirit" demanded by Trenchard.
|
|
|
7 April 2004, 09:02 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Klein-Bahnhof Nachtigall
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Neil_E@Apr 6 2004, 07:15 AM
[b]
Maybe it was just as well that MVR didn't survive. I wonder would he have been as revered if he had been found sitting on the defendants' benches at Nuremburg in 1945?
|
dig those shades!
|
|
|
7 April 2004, 02:13 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 4,809
|
Interesting to speculate upon MvR's postwar career. You can argue either way: his immense prestige woulda overshadowed Goering (who probably would NOT have been Kommodore JG.I) or HG's relationship with Hitler woulda proceeded regardless, thus outdoing MvR.
In either case, the available evidence indicates that MvR would not have been oriented toward a strategic bombing Luftwaffe. He said that if he were not a fighter guy he'd want to support the infantry, which means Schusta/Schlasta which means a tactical Luftwaffe largely along the lines it developed anyway.
However, it's possible that MvR, being more astute than HG (and more mission oriented), might have foreseen the need for a heavy bomber arm and supported same in the 30s. (Poor Udet, the stuka advocate, would've been caught in the middle.) Whether MvR might have formed an alliance with Milch et al must remain in the lap of the gods.
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
|
|
|
8 April 2004, 02:34 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: right here
Posts: 1,524
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Gregvan@Apr 5 2004, 12:24 AM
[b]No one doubts Fonck's extraordinary abilities or his mature approach to aerial warfare. He practiced only moderate drinking, got plenty of sleep, practiced his shooting constantly and paced himself (unlike Guynemer).
|
That is how you become the top scoring Entente pilot and Ace of Aces, if you apply Neil's criteria, despite having commenced in the trenches, flying over 500 hours in unarmed caudron observation aircraft from 1915 to April 1917. Ability, preparation and self discipline.
A good, informative post, Greg
__________________
Honorary Consultant on Policy and Ethics
On a Holy Purpose
The absolute self-appointed authority
Too myopic to comprehend
|
|
|
9 April 2004, 04:13 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: right here
Posts: 1,524
|
Quote:
Originally posted by cameldriver@Apr 7 2004, 02:31 PM
[b]I think that this was a phenomenom enjoyed by Albert Ball, in the RFC, as well. While a number of British pilots surpassed his record, I think he was the star turn to the men of the RFC and the British public. Although the Brits did not publicize their aces as did the Germans, French, etc., there is mention in the books about Ball referring to the many letters he received from adoring "fans". He personified the "offensive spirit" demanded by Trenchard.
|
It depends upon what you mean by "British”. If you mean “English” then he was surpassed by two, Mannock and McCudden. If you mean “from the British Isles” then it was three. Mannock, McCudden and McElroy. If you mean “British Empire” then there were 9 ahead of him. Whichever you mean, I think you are right anyway.
__________________
Honorary Consultant on Policy and Ethics
On a Holy Purpose
The absolute self-appointed authority
Too myopic to comprehend
|
|
|
12 April 2004, 10:47 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Norwood, Ma. USA
Posts: 186
|
Lets not forget the Press. France and Germany made avaition heroes out of their successful flyers, (unlike Britain). Fonck's first victory with Spa 103 was 5 May 17, by which time Guynemer had 38 victories and was the sweetheart of the French military, press and the people. After Guynemers death, and with his increase in victories, I'm sure Fonck thought that his place in French combat aviation was never truely recognized. Ego, yes! justified, possibly!
VBR
Joe
__________________
"Tis a mans game, if ever there was a mans game in this world; and its boys with the soft fleece of adolescence on their cheeks that play it best. "
The Annals of 100 Sqd
|
|
|
12 April 2004, 07:02 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
So has anyone ever researched Fonk's victory list and found out how many of his credited victory's can be accounted for ?. Obviously I'm aware that the French had a much more stringent claim system than other Entente air forces , but I'm interested to see what cross referencing has turned up ? .
In " Over the Front " it only seems to give notes on which victories were shared . I haven't checked the losses in " The Jasta War Chronolgy " yet to see if German losses are attributed to Fonk ( when I get a spare moment ) , but someone must have checked out his list at some stage in time .
Thanks
|
|
|
|
12 April 2004, 07:04 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Ooops , I meant Fonck ...now that really is being a dumb amateur ...apology's !
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 PM.
|