The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Learn how to remove ads

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > People


People Topics related to WWI aviation personnel


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 August 2006, 09:03 AM   #21 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Coast
Posts: 158
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef scott
Well, if the nothing else, the Albatrosse look fantasic!

Let's keep our fingers crossed and our disbelief suspended...

Indeed!! My favorite plane. But what's with the headrest on the baron's plane? I thought Voss was the one known for using one from time to time?

B
Biber is offline  
Old 4 August 2006, 10:42 PM   #22 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: England
Posts: 140
 
MvR Film

Acording to the Winnipeg Free Press this will also include a re-evaluation on Brown shooting down the Baron, something which was impossible from the angle of the bullet wound. Joseph Feinnes is apparently playing Brown and the intimation is that all this will be a view on the event rather than strictly historical fact. Why am I not surprised? Can any folm makers stick to real life rather then trying to make somethign dramatic. Can't they see that by sticking to facts it IS dramatic!! As the article says: Scholarly nuance is sure to take a back seat in the film version of the deadly dogfight. As apparently too they will include the last words of the Baron as Gunner Twycross came to the downed DrI, the film makers must have read The Baron's Last Flight, and have then ignored the medical fact that vR could not have lived long enough after Brown's burst to have gone over the ridge and back, in order to crash land by the brickworks. Selective history making or what??? Normanf
normanf is offline  
Old 7 August 2006, 09:18 AM   #23 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
TomVrille's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 1,000
 
Fantasy vs Fact

This point has been raised before, but I think it bears repeating. Besides that, it's nice to vent a little spleen now and again!

This film will be severely criticized, and rightfully so. Much of the criticism will be due to the potpourri of fact and fantasy in the story line. Given a decision to craft a story about actual historical figures, some fidelity to the truth of these people's lives should be maintained. If a person's life story is too dreary and uninteresting to be the basis of a film, why not seek out more promising subjects? Surely this would be preferable to weaving a web of deliberate lies that might take years to untangle.

If the story a film producer wants to tell doesn't match up with the actual historical figure chosen to be the leading player in that story, the obvious fix is to create a fictitious character who can conform to the demands of the story, whatever they may be. It is a pity this approach was not taken with The Red Baron. The aircraft photo mock-ups look very good, and show at lot of attention to detail. So long as the flight dynamics models chosen for the computer graphics are not more appropriate for an F-15 than an Albatros D.III, some very nice flight sequences should be possible.

Failing even in this, it may yet be possible to salvage something from the film. All that is necessary is to incorporate a small beagle in flying kit, zooming across the screen on his faithful Sopwith doghouse from time to time, howling curses at the film's namesake.
__________________
"A surprise attack is much more demoralising than any other form, and generally results in the person attacked diving or pulling the machine into such a position that it forms a most satisfactory target for the few seconds necessary to deliver a decisive blow. " - R. S. Dallas
TomVrille is offline  
Old 7 August 2006, 05:57 PM   #24 (permalink)
HistoryBuff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Being my favorite part of world war one, I am a bit biased. Still, we are talking about the most famous fighter pilot of all time, hands down. There has to be something there that can be put on film. It is a rediculous Hollywood idea that every movie has to have crap in it and be dramatized so people will watch it. What person would not watch a film full of dogfights and a view from the other side? At worst it would be an action flick, and people watch those every day. There is simply no real need to change history to that degree. Put out your best interpretation of Richthofen's character using all the facts that we know as well as what you think is the real truth. There is a wealth of possibility there, and more than enough make a lead character people would watch I think. It's Richthofen, 80 years ago, fighting a war that is in some ways hard to understand, back in the mists of history. Myth and mystery surround Richthofen.

It would take effort to put out a thought-out interpretation of who he really was. It doesn't take any effort at all to put out another rediculous Hollywood story, using Richthofen's name. It'd be great to see a movie that isn't necessarily spot on for historical fact, also allowing for all that isn't put down on paper. Inventing conversations, events, great. But enough of what we know would be there. That would be awesome. What's going on over there in Germany and Prague is not poetic license, it's the Hollywoodization of Richthofen. It doesn't improve on the real thing, the story doesn't need all that crap. 80+ years of interest have to prove that.
 
Old 7 August 2006, 06:47 PM   #25 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Copperhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 490
kinda like "Blacksheep Squadron". Member back in the '70's? Boyington once remarked, "I never remembered all those women at the front!"
__________________
The nation that forgets its defenders, will itself be forgotten. Calvin Coolidge
Copperhead is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
movie, manfred, richthofen



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Manfred von Richthofen Barrett Other WWI Aviation 4 8 February 2004 10:19 AM
Manfred von Richthofen - Fokker D.VII ? Dirk People 3 17 November 2003 05:34 AM
Medals of Manfred von Richthofen? Dirk Medals & Decorations 4 16 November 2003 09:49 PM
Portraits of Manfred von RICHTHOFEN Philippe JOURDAN People 1 20 August 2003 03:39 PM
Manfred von Richthofen vs von T. rammjaeger 1999 10 20 November 1999 08:49 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome