Dear Al Lowe, and others,
I have just completed my review of The Making of
Billy Bishop for CBC Radio, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
I will be interviewed by Ron Robinson Friday on tape, and the tape will be broadcast on the Manitoba CBC Radio network in the 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM slot, Saturday or Sunday morning, 25 or 26 May.
On your question about the Lewis machine gun, my research shows that it surfaces in print with Arthur Bishop's biography, The Courage of the Early Morning, in 1965, then is repeated by Fry in Air of Battle in 1974. I invite anyone to unearth an earlier reference in print - I would like to hear of it.
If the story of casting it overboard due to weight was told by Billy Bishop to his son, which one scholar has said is the case, that is about the best evidence we have that it did happen.
However, I don't believe the story.
I have never found Arthur Bishop to be a diligent scholar, and rarely does he do any original research. If he is relying on his own and his father's memory, it is a shaky foundation.
In addition, I don't know that Fry uses the story in public until 1974, long after Arthur Bishop mentions it. If Fry was told that story by Billy Bishop on June 2nd, 1917, why did it never become public? Why did Bishop fail to mention it in Winged Warfare, yet mention his complimenting of his armourer after getting out of the Nieuport with an absent Lewis??
On Greenhous' standard of a civil trial, i.e., the balance of probabilities, I find in favour of Bishop on June 2nd, 1917, and against him in May-June 1918. I think there are possibilities for June 2nd that are not investigated - moreover, Fry's version as solid evidence in any court is questionable for several complex reasons.
The victory claims in 1918 are a different challenge, given that few if any in 1918 were prepared to question a VC-recipient. As one Great War pilot said to me inan interview 11 years ago, "Young man, Victoria Crosses do not grow on trees, and you do not tell a VC winner what he can, and cannot do!!"
On the whole, I recommend the Greenhous book to enthusiasts - its point of view is clear, it reads easily, a lot of information is now in one source volume, and it is not hard to follow the arguments. One does not have to agree with its findings to get value from The Making of Billy Bishop
Cheers, Wayne Ralph, author