The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Learn how to remove ads

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft


Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 February 2004, 05:02 PM #1 (permalink)
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 8
 
I have a question for all you experts out there; I have always been interested in the Sopwith Pup, and the construction method used in the fusalage was the wire braced wooden truss method.

Does anyone know if there was significant stretching of the wire bracing over time, and if so, how often it needed to be adjusted or replaced.

I realize the answer has a lot to do with how the aircraft is used, acro, combat maneuvering versus low stress straight and level flight. But since that construction technique was very common in the WW1 era (not just Sopwith) there should be a lot of history to go by.

I've always wondered how much of a maintenance issue that is/was.

Thank you all in advance for all your help!

Mike D.
mdiam is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 3 February 2004, 06:07 PM #2 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
jumpinjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jan Servaites - Dayton, Ohio 45420
Posts: 1,280
 
I don't have any statistical information on Time Between Failures, but if you look at it from an engineering view point, the fuselage wooden members would all be in compression and wood can take compression loads pretty well. There is also the same bracing in the wings and one can find that same technique in homebuilt aircraft. Another thing to consider is WWI aircraft were not expected to have any longevity. They probably were build simple, quick & light just to get as many out there, and stressing performance while trading durability.
Jan
__________________
jumpinjan is offline  
Old 5 February 2004, 07:02 AM #3 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 163
Typically, wires don't stretch, but the loop and ferrel ends can slip, causing same net effect. This is not an overt problem (avoiding the given the situations you mention), and was not abandon until the late '20's that threaded tie rods replaced wires in production a/c. Travel Air (the Witchita Fokker) employed wire braced (w/ferreled ends) steel tube fuselage and is rather stout allowing huge engines and unlimited aerobatics.
__________________
Charlie
visaliaaviation is offline  
Old 8 February 2004, 03:19 AM #4 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Wind In The Wires's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Painesville, Ohio
Posts: 170
 
On aircraft with threaded flying wires the issue is with the anchors (typically a nut and washer) pulling through the wood anchor blocks. Which is why you'll occasionally see a pilot "twanging" the wires on his walk around.

As to stretch in the wires, G loads stretch the loaded wires enough that the unloaded wires go slack and vibrate so fast that they become invisible which is what creates the singing sound that you hear when watching a biplane doing aerobatics.

BTW, the "rapping" sound you hear when watching a T6 or a Pitts doing aerobatics is the prop tips going supersonic.
__________________
First rule of ground school; This is the ground, don't hit it going fast.

You start flying with a full bag of luck and an empty bag for experience. The object is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.
Wind In The Wires is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
construction, method



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ssw d-iii, 'iv construction expositor Aircraft 2 11 June 2007 04:47 PM
Method of transfer for US pilots stephen Other WWI Aviation 1 17 February 2004 11:12 AM
SSW D.IV Construction PaulCameron Aircraft 1 15 March 2002 03:40 PM
hangar construction Mark_Miller Other WWI Aviation 2 21 February 2002 03:43 PM
Gontermann-Method and Fluent Fire rammjaeger 1998 3 29 September 1998 03:51 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright ©1997 - 2009 The Aerodrome