The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft


Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft

Learn how to remove ads


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 May 2006, 08:26 PM   #1321 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Posts: 110
 
repiica aircraft

I have followed the debate on internal corrosion in welded steel tube fuselages with interest. Internal flushing with hot linseed oil was a pretty standard practice in these structures at one time. Any safeguard against out of sight corrosion can only be beneficial.

On the technique of pressure testing the structure for corrosion holes, pin-holes or cracks I encountered an interesting method when converting to a Zlin aerobatic aircraft in Czecho-Slovakia some years ago. This particular aircraft type had a welded steel tube centre section, a highly stressed component of the structure. An always visible in the cockpit pressure guage was tapped into the tubes and the entire structure was pressurised with nitrogen.

Any crack in the structure, either before or during flight was instantly detectable to the pilot by the loss of pressure and the aircraft not flown or promptly landed.

I had not encounted this method before and it appeared to me to be a smart
way of increasing safety by the addition of the weight of one small pressure guage.

regards

Mustang
mustang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2006, 06:58 AM   #1322 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Virginia Beach VA
Posts: 128
 
As far as I know differential pressure was originally patented by either Sikorsky or Boeing Vertol on rotor blades. Each blade was put under slight pressure and there was a gauge in the root of the rotor. Loss of pressure and you didn't fly. Vertol (or Igor) didn't like that there was a patent and put a vacuum on their rotors to get around it. It's been years since I looked at a rotor head but when I was in the Navy it seems all of them had the pressure gauges.
hank jarrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 May 2006, 10:06 AM   #1323 (permalink)
Tim
Observer
 
Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 26
 
I recall working on an S-55 helicopter that had pressure indicators on each rotor blade at the root of the blade.

In the heavy equipment/diesel engine businesses airfilters are equipped with a simple indicator that I plan to use for my frame. As far as I can see anything over ambient is lots of pressure so I don't figure I have to get crazy with plumbing and fittings.

Last edited by Tim; 3 May 2006 at 10:11 AM.
Tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2006, 09:04 AM   #1324 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Rittersbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 218
 
Weight

Greetings Gentlemen,

I have to say that this thread is very interesting. Can anyone tell me what the finished flying weight will be for your Dr.1?

Thanks!

Ritt
Rittersbach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2006, 10:25 AM   #1325 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 625
 
Under pressure..

FYI and keeping with the German theme, Porsche pressure checked the chassis of their 917 race cars which were tubular structures.
Regards,
Maxim08
Maxim08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2006, 12:26 PM   #1326 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Jim Bruton's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,084
 
finished weight

Rittersbach,

Hard to say exactly, mostly because of the engine choices. A LeRhone, a modern opposed cylinder Lycoming, a Rotec 150hp and an M-14 or Continental 200hp all weigh different amounts, and the addition of counterbalance weights will give a different end result. Hopefully, no matter the weight, the centers of balance will come to the same place.
Jim Bruton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 May 2006, 05:10 PM   #1327 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Rittersbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 218
 
Jim,

Thanks for the reply about the weight. The reason I was asking was to give some indication as to the performance for take off and for cruising. I have no idea what HP you guys would be running but I would think that the weight would play a huge role in performance.

Thanks!

ps. Jim, has anyone ever told you that you bear a strong resemblance to Fred Couples.

Ritt

Last edited by Rittersbach; 7 May 2006 at 06:45 PM.
Rittersbach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2006, 08:13 PM   #1328 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: DFW area
Posts: 135
 
Tripe Builders et. all,

I began working on the 3/4 inch tubing aft of the cockpit. After much time and frustration, I can say I have almost completed tack welding the entire fuselage. All I lack is the most aft bay cross tube and then welding the longerons together which will eventually hold the rudder. Now it is time for a good cigar and whiskey to enjoy the fruits of my frustrations.

C'ya
joepilot

Beginning the Cross Tubing
Highslide JS

Almost Done looking from the engine aft
Highslide JS

Almost Done looking forward
Highslide JS
joepilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2006, 05:41 AM   #1329 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
greatwarpilot's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 540
 
Great work Joepilot. I'm glad to see that you're making such good progress.

If the weather co-operates we should have some pictures of our triplane's first post rebuild flight to share! Should be fun to get our tripes up with yours one of these days.

Cheers

Edward
__________________
Edward P. Soye
greatwarpilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2006, 04:09 AM   #1330 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Dogtail2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 409
 
Great work Joepilot

What frustrations did you experience, for those of us following?

Pete
Dogtail2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
ron bloomquist, group, dr1, builders, sands




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 The Aerodrome