










|
| Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
8 September 2006, 08:09 AM
|
#1521 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 540
|
Hey Jim,
I'm not sure how specific the Sands plans are when it comes to inspection ports, but when we put them on our triplane's top wing we basically put them where we knew we'd need them.
Here is a shot of the underside right before it went on the airplane and you can see most of the inspection ports opened up.
Not sure if this is helpful, but it does allow us to insert and remove those forward bolts on the cabanes that you're talking about.
You'll also not inspection ports for each aileron hinge and I believe one of the cabane ports doubles to give access to a pulley in the aileron control cable circuit.
Cheers
Edward
__________________
Edward P. Soye
|
|
|
8 September 2006, 10:16 AM
|
#1522 (permalink)
|
|
Observer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 90
|
Kingsbury DR. 1
Last month the volunteers at Kingsbury attached the center wing to our DR 1. Yeah!
We have another work-weekend to attach the other the wings tomorrow.
We still have to finish the aluminum flarings around the center wing/fuselage, and the cowl, but the day is fast approaching when she'll fly. The 80 hp LeRhone has been overhauled and is off camera waiting to go.
When we hit this stage in the building process, we suddenly had to shift our focus from the big items to little things like access panels, throttle linkages, windshield, control cables, etc. So it looks like very little progress is being made, but it's just that the progress that is being made isn't as noticable.
In the bg you see Kelly - a volunteer - who is resting after a difficult session of attaching the cabane struts. Also you see the D VII that is completed and waiting final engine mods to the inverted Gypsy Queen. The prop is sitting in the box waiting to be bolted on.
I have also included a pix of a 3D model I made this week of a Siemens-Schuckert rotary. It's a work in progress.
Last edited by Sgt Pepper; 13 September 2007 at 11:16 AM.
|
|
|
8 September 2006, 03:05 PM
|
#1523 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,084
|
Thanks Edward!
Your photo exactly answers my question! You simply put an inspection plate right there- perfectly practical. I have heard that the original DR-1 did NOT have an access there- you simply had better not damage the bolt or you had a problem. I have also heard that sometimes field modifications were made to give access....so we'll figure something out in between.
Many thanks again!
Sgt. Pepper, congratulations on a beautiful aircraft- do please post your photos here as you get those other wings in place. Do you have a take off date yet? =-)
Jim
|
|
|
8 September 2006, 07:01 PM
|
#1524 (permalink)
|
|
Observer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Visalia CA
Posts: 43
|
Jim,
Keep us informed. I can't promise to come, but it would be great to attend a "covering party" for your bird. My favorite beer is FREE, cold and wet.
Charlie
|
|
|
9 September 2006, 03:59 PM
|
#1525 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 409
|
Progress update
Finished the tail feathers and mounted them on the fuselage. Its starting to look like an aeroplane!
Also fitted the tailplane struts. Had to tweek the fuselage bracket to make sure the streamline tube faces the airflow correctly. If made as per Sands drawing they would face down slightly.
Also tack welded brake parts together.
Anyone intending to fit brakes to their machine should check out the Wicks website. They have the Dr 1 brake kit listed at $804 which is an absolute steal!  Do the maths.
Last edited by Dogtail2; 9 September 2006 at 04:24 PM.
|
|
|
9 September 2006, 04:25 PM
|
#1526 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 409
|
Brakes
Seat frame
Regards,
Pete
|
|
|
9 September 2006, 09:12 PM
|
#1527 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 306
|
Pete,
Outstanding work !
Sorry so late in responding to your earlier Spandau question - Although I have'nt had a chance to accurately weigh them, I would guesstimate my guns to wiegh about seven pounds each.
Between you, Jim, Fritz, JoePilot and all the others who have made serious headway on your fuselages - stand by....I will be heaping the questions on you guys as I start mine !
Andy

|
|
|
10 September 2006, 12:51 AM
|
#1528 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 409
|
Hi Andy,
Good luck with your fuselage, and ask away.
Actually I have a question for you regarding the undercarriage. What size tube did you use for the 2 tubes which run each side of the axle and join the shock boxes? The plans call for 13/16" dia. x .049w. I can not find anyone who stocks this size. If you know of a stockist let me know. I tried all the usual, Aircraft Spruce,Wicks etc.
Thanks, Pete
|
|
|
10 September 2006, 02:18 PM
|
#1529 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,084
|
Pete,
What great progress you are making! What's next? Landing gear? Again, nicely done!
Jim
|
|
|
10 September 2006, 02:50 PM
|
#1530 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 306
|
Pete,
I ran into the same problem trying to find that correct size tubing - I went ahead and settled for the 13/16" X .120 wall tubing available from Wick's. A little thicker wall than what the plans call for but it was really all I could find.....maybe the size on the drawings was a little more readily available in 1972 ???
Andy

|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 AM.
|