










|
| Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
17 June 2008, 06:40 PM
|
#2271 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,070
|
Steve,
that's what I am using too, only difference is mine is a flat mount. i figure i can always change it out in a few years, if i feel the need.
Jim
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 12:00 AM
|
#2272 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 409
|
Thanks to all.
You should see the size of the scrap pile trying to get those chutes right!
Jim,
With regards to the Lycoming engine mount, as I understand it, there is Dynafocal 1, Dynafocal 2 and Conical. I think 'Flat mount' is the same as Conical mount. I could be wrong here so somebody else might confirm.
Pete
Last edited by Dogtail2; 18 June 2008 at 01:05 AM.
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 04:50 AM
|
#2273 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,070
|
Pete,
By "flat", I am referring to that referred to in the plans. Looks pretty flat to me, as opposed to Ed's which is definitely a dynafocal, with the angled attach points. Those attach points are what I believed were the reference for "flat". I'm with you- if anyone can shed more light on the terminology, that would be good!
Jim
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 05:30 AM
|
#2274 (permalink)
|
|
Observer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fresno,CA
Posts: 14
|
Pete, Jim,
I have always known flat and conical to be the same also. I decided on that mount configuration since Ron Sands recommended it of using a Lycoming. Plus having more room to play with the engine mount moment arm to help the cg location.
Steve
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 06:07 AM
|
#2275 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,070
|
The next trick will be for you to find an engine that is rear-carb configured, or modifiable (sp?) to that.
Mine is an O-320 B1B. maybe that helps.
Jim
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 06:22 AM
|
#2276 (permalink)
|
|
Observer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fresno,CA
Posts: 14
|
Jim,
Yes, your engine model number does help alot. I was told by a few pilot friends that helicopters use alot of the conical mount lycoming engines. But I am not sure how they configure the carb system.
Have you picked out a prop yet?
Steve
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 06:42 AM
|
#2277 (permalink)
|
|
Observer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 41
|
Flat or Conical mounts
Hi Jim,
I've never heard of it being termed a "flat" mount, but the conical mount Lycomings have an even or "flat" mounting arrangement. Conical alluding to the type of conical rubber bushing used to insulate the engine vibrations from the airframe,
The angled type mount is called a Dynafocal mount and uses large rubber/aluminum insulators and there are 2 types of that mount Type 1 and Type 2 LOL.
As far as rear mount carbs, Most fuel injected lycomings from say a Piper Arrow will have the injector mounted to the rear. there are only a few rear Carb types, and they use a side draft type carb the HA-6 which is commonly found on the O-360-F1A6 in a Cessna 172 RG. O-320's you'll find the engine from a Twin Commanche will have the rear mount since it was originally fuel injected. I'm not sure what mount type it uses.
If you are converting a Constant speed prop crankshaft engine to a fixed pitch, you'll need to get your hands on a copy of Lycoming Service Instruction S.I.1435 which is available on the Lycoming website under the support link.
__________________
Any Landing you can walk away from is a good landing, BUT a truly Great landing, is one in which you can immediately re-use the airplane!
Last edited by US95Damiani; 18 June 2008 at 06:52 AM.
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 08:55 AM
|
#2278 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,070
|
Steve,
I have contacted Culver props about making me an Axial-ified prop. They can push it up to 84" I think, have done it before, and the last price quote was $625. I have the Axial transfers waiting.
US95Damiani- thanks for the insight. I do have the HA-6 carb and this will allow me to use the holes in the side cowling.
Jim
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 09:10 AM
|
#2279 (permalink)
|
|
Scout Pilot
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 409
|
Good stuff US95Damiani, Thanks.
Jim, where do I get Axial transfers?
Here is a shot of the Narkunas built DrI with a normal front mounted carb. Looks ok I think.
Dynafocal mount on the same Triplane

Last edited by Dogtail2; 18 June 2008 at 09:28 AM.
|
|
|
18 June 2008, 07:26 PM
|
#2280 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,070
|
not sure where to get the transfers Pete- i got a set from someone in Canada. Does anyone have good enough art from which to make more? Just now I can't find them but if and when i do, I'll scan them for you and maybe- worst case- you can make your own.
back to you on this later.
jim
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 PM.
|