The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft


Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft

Learn how to remove ads


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 November 2008, 01:00 PM   #1261 (permalink)
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 81
 
It looks like M/N or M over n,not mm and if you look at the zeros in the other numbers on the page, it doesn't look like it's the number 80 either.

Just an observation.

Sean
sobrien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 02:17 PM   #1262 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Bookmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Marianna, Fl
Posts: 405
 
Definitely a brain teaser.
Dale
__________________
Dale Cavin, Marianna, FL
Bookmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 03:04 PM   #1263 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
RobW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 339
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Brooks View Post
According to the cash drawings (working from memory here) the angle of attack on the bottom wing is 1.5 deg.
Jeff,
I'm sorry to be picky... but don't you mean angle of incidence?

You are doing a great job here and I'm thoroughly enjoying watching you build this aircraft...

rob
__________________
Great War Aerodrome

In the air, over there...

www.greatwaraerodrome.com

RobW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 03:20 PM   #1264 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Jeff Brooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,277
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobW View Post
Jeff,
I'm sorry to be picky... but don't you mean angle of incidence?
rob
You are absolutely correct here Rob, I do mean Incidence.

Here is my problem ... Mostly when I find something like this, you can see that the error is caused by a fat pencil & poor eyesight measuring the drawing. This is usually just a millimeter or two. This error is a whopping 13mm! So I am left wondering where I went wrong.

Highslide JS

I guess I am also wondering if 1.5 deg. angle of incidence is based on the bottom of the airfoil, or the aerodynamic cord line.
__________________
Jeff Brooks
Jeff Brooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 06:09 PM   #1265 (permalink)
Observer
 
Tim Plunkett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Daytona Bh, FL
Posts: 88
 
Aoi

My vote would be the chord.
Tim Plunkett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 November 2008, 06:30 PM   #1266 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Jeff Brooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,277
 
Unfortunately, it is not that simple. As you see in the drawing, the apex of the circle on the nose of the rib is 36mm, while the angle of incidence should only be 31. That means lowering the nose of the rib by 5mm.

Plus the cash drawing shows an increase using a line along the bottom edge of the rib. I just am not sure how much that line is elevated.
__________________
Jeff Brooks
Jeff Brooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2008, 12:14 AM   #1267 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Dogtail2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 409
 
Jeff,

Perhaps you are right and the drawing is wrong. It happens.
I would look to an alternative scource for a comparison.
Dogtail2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2008, 05:03 AM   #1268 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
womenfly2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NH
Posts: 546
 
Thumbs up

1200/15 = 80 M/n ..... this may help explain Cash's drawing: M/n Polygon

Looking good Jeff!

WF2

Last edited by womenfly2; 11 November 2008 at 05:33 AM.
womenfly2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2008, 05:09 AM   #1269 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
RobW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 339
 
what does the math say if you use the bottom of the airfoil? Looking at the drawing where it says alpha = 1.5... the arrows only go to the bottom of the airfoil.

rob
__________________
Great War Aerodrome

In the air, over there...

www.greatwaraerodrome.com

RobW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 November 2008, 05:11 AM   #1270 (permalink)
Observer
 
Tim Plunkett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Daytona Bh, FL
Posts: 88
 
Aoa

Lowering the nose by 5mm may indeed put the AOA at 1.5. If the AOA and the AOI is suppose to be the same your fine.
Tim Plunkett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
fokker dvii project




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 The Aerodrome