The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft


Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft

Learn how to remove ads


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

View Poll Results: Finish Options for Sopwith Baby
Serial Number 8165 Sopwith Factory Built Baby 18 69.23%
Serial Number 2071 Blackburn Factory Built Baby 8 30.77%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 February 2008, 02:25 AM   #121 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 293
 
Quote:
Nick and Joe:
Any preferences for capstrip and 3-ply suppliers (A/C Spruce, Wicks, other?)?
Have bought stuff from both of them & both excellent to deal with. The main issue with the ply is who has got the size you want. The Snipe has an oddball size for the main rib ply of 3/20" which equates to 3.81mm so I ended up using a 4mm ply from a local supplier.

Joe
What size ply does the Baby have for the main Ribs? Is it a more readily available size?

Nick
Nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2008, 03:01 AM   #122 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 658
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick View Post

Joe
What size ply does the Baby have for the main Ribs? Is it a more readily available size?

Nick
Nick,

I guess I got lucky there,...3/16" easy enough, they have in stock.

Took a quick peek at Spar stock (Wicks) and shipment issues. It seems that 10' and 14' lengths are available via special shipping. Outboard wing panels for me are 121.625" (10.135').

So how do I deal with that silly little .0135",...buy 14' and cut back to that 10.135' or splice two short pieces that can be shipped UPS???
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2008, 05:38 AM   #123 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
drrivah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 183
 
Sop leading/trailing edge detail

RE: Post #114 on original Sop Snipe and Dolphin wing and A& P 121 trailing edge discussion, wing details (lower left mainplane near wing root, both) of Pup replica (San Diego ASM) below. Leading edge nosing left intact, and trailing edge oval rather than tear drop section. Relevant detail from original Pup plans below. Was nosing lightened on all original Sop leading edges, and were original trailers always A & P 121 on Sop main planes?

-pete
drrivah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2008, 06:56 AM   #124 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 658
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by drrivah View Post
RE: Post #114 on original Sop Snipe and Dolphin wing and A& P 121 trailing edge discussion, wing details (lower left mainplane near wing root, both) of Pup replica (San Diego ASM) below. Leading edge nosing left intact, and trailing edge oval rather than tear drop section. Relevant detail from original Pup plans below. Was nosing lightened on all original Sop leading edges, and were original trailers always A & P 121 on Sop main planes?

-pete
Pete,

Nice images!

I have Pup and Strutter plans for reference. Have noted that the nosing is the same for the Baby & Pup but did not yet look at the Strutter.

Have also noted that both specify the A&P 121 section, including the wingtip and center section bows?! This is causing me a bit of confusion as to how to proceed.

Options appear to be,...

- similar tubing as close to original as possible?!

- Off the shelf trailing edge solutions?!

- laminated wooden bows with off the shelf trailing edge?!

Addendum to post: Looking at the Strutter in France, I see the wingtip bow is round tubing (steel). Not being home, I now recall the ends of both spars on the Baby accept 1/2" round tubing.
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.

Last edited by Joe Perkel; 9 February 2008 at 09:26 AM. Reason: Addendum
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2008, 06:58 AM   #125 (permalink)
Observer
 
Nieuport pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 42
 
I have tried to make the AP 121 trailing edge using rollers. I didn't have much luck as the tube wants to twist and bend as it passes thru. Without spendin alot of time making a bunch of rollers in a row to handle this I have decided to just take 3/8 x .035 mild steel tube and cruch itto 1/4. I am using it on my Pup and Hantiot Hd.1 projects and by the time you cover the parts it should look fine.
Rick Bennett
Nieuport pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2008, 07:22 AM   #126 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
drrivah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 183
 
Wing Tip bows and A & P 121

Hi Joe: 1/2" x 0.035 round 4130 seems to be specified on many light homebuilts for wing tip bows. I have seen trailing edge (tubes) fitted to ribs with copper strip fittings, and the Jenny seems to have lots of copper (vs steel) fittings on empennage. Not sure how copper compares with steel or why one vs the other.

Hi Rick, how much difference in aerodynamic drag when trailing edge is A & P 121 vs 1/4 to 1/2 round or oval tube? Also, if you crush tubing or roll it, do people generally magnaflux to check on integrity of the reformed pieces? There must be some technical trick to rolling long lengths of A & P 121 without the twisting you mention. I recall Achim keeps the tubing in tension as it pulls, rather than rolling it out with the rolled end free. Did your trials keep the tube in tension or was the rolled end free?

Thanks.

-pete
drrivah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2008, 07:41 AM   #127 (permalink)
Observer
 
Nieuport pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 42
 
The larger the trailing edge the more drag. How much, I don't know. My Nieuport uses 1/2 trailing edged and it flies fine. All these WW1 types have LOTS of drag anyway.
When I tried to form the AP121 I just cranked it thru the one set of rollers. Sometimes it would come out ok for a foot or so and then twist. Since one side of the tube is larger than the other side it just doesn't want to stay straight. I am sure I could have solved the problem by adding more rollers but decided I didn't want to spend the time.
To me a 90 percent perfect machine flying five years sooner is more important. Someone else may want to spend the time. I love to build but also fly and am not getting any younger.
No need to check mild steel for cracking but 4130 can be a problem if bent too sharply. There was No 4130 in any original WW1 type so why bother for parts like this.
Rick Bennett
Nieuport pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2008, 09:28 AM   #128 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 658
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nieuport pilot View Post

I have decided to just take 3/8 x .035 mild steel tube and cruch itto 1/4. I am using it on my Pup and Hantiot Hd.1 projects and by the time you cover the parts it should look fine.

Rick Bennett
Aha...a reasonable solution,.. I knew there would be someone with one!

I don't recall who's tubing smasher jig I saw on the Dawn Patrol site, (perhaps yours Rick), but I suspect this is the best likely solution here to stay closer to authentic. A bit of work but, that's ok with me.

Thanks Rick, Pete!
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2008, 10:21 AM   #129 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
baldeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,182
 
I made some oval tubing for the trailing edges of the ailerons on my 1926 Ryan by welding a ring to the end of the tubing, and pulling it through rollers with a come-a-long hooked to a pickup truck. Kind of crude, but it worked OK. Don't remember the size of the tubing, probably 1/2" or 3/8" by .035".
baldeagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2008, 01:04 PM   #130 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 658
 
A&P Trailing Edge

Quote:
Originally Posted by baldeagle View Post
I made some oval tubing for the trailing edges of the ailerons on my 1926 Ryan by welding a ring to the end of the tubing, and pulling it through rollers with a come-a-long hooked to a pickup truck. Kind of crude, but it worked OK. Don't remember the size of the tubing, probably 1/2" or 3/8" by .035".

Yet another entirely clever idea! Will have to test this and see what results,..thanks Andrew!

Thanks to all who responded to my initial confusion over the A&P Section, and the trailing edge in general. Now sufficiently confident to move on with the CAD model of the wing structures with the original A&P profile, knowing fully well construction solutions are there.
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
sopwith, seaplane, rnas, baby, sopwith baby project




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 The Aerodrome